How to review a scientific paper

被引:10
作者
Tandon, Rajiv [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, POB 103424, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajp.2014.08.007
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Scientific observations must survive the scrutiny of experts before they are disseminated to the broader community because their publication in a scientific journal provides a stamp of validity. Although critical review of a manuscript by peers prior to publication in a scientific journal is a central element in this process, virtually no formal guidance is provided to reviewers about the nature of the task. In this article, the essence of peer review is described and critical steps in the process are summarized. The role of the peer reviewer as an intermediary and arbiter in the process of scientific communication between the authors and the readers via the vehicle of the particular journal is discussed and the responsibilities of the reviewer to each of the three parties (the author/s, readers, and the Journal editor) are defined. The two formal products of this activity are separate sets of reviewer comments to the editor and the authors and these are described. Ethical aspects of the process are considered and rewards accruing to the reviewer summarized. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 127
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Peer Review Guidance: How Do You Write a Good Review?
    Allen, Thomas Wesley
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2013, 113 (12): : 916 - 920
  • [2] How to review a paper
    Benos, DJ
    Kirk, KL
    Hall, JE
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2003, 27 (02) : 47 - 52
  • [3] Bjork BC, 2009, INFORM RES, V14
  • [4] What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?
    Black, N
    van Rooyen, S
    Godlee, F
    Smith, R
    Evans, S
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03): : 231 - 233
  • [5] THE EVOLUTION OF EDITORIAL PEER-REVIEW
    BURNHAM, JC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10): : 1323 - 1329
  • [6] Practicing evidence-based psychiatry. 3. Interpreting treatment guidelines
    Clark, Ashley
    Rankupalli, Babu
    Tandon, Rajiv
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 4 (04) : 304 - 308
  • [7] Elsevier, REV GUID
  • [8] Practicing evidence-based psychiatry-2. Interpreting integrative literature: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Haj-Ibrahim, Julia
    Tandon, Rajiv
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 4 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [9] How I review an original scientific article
    Hoppin, FG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 166 (08) : 1019 - 1023
  • [10] Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Tatsioni, Athina
    Karassa, Fotini B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2010, 40 (04) : 285 - 287