Using Global Reporting Initiative indicators for CSR programs

被引:39
作者
Wilburn, Kathleen [1 ]
Wilburn, Ralph [1 ]
机构
[1] St Edwards Univ, Sch Business & Management, Management, Austin, TX 78704 USA
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Performance indicators; Stakeholder theory of ethics; Shared value; Sustainability; Stakeholder management; Ethics; Stakeholders; Social responsibility;
D O I
10.1108/20412561311324078
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose that the Global Reporting Initiative's (GRI) reporting guidelines, specifically its performance indicators, can be used to help a company create ethical corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies and to also help stakeholder groups evaluate how much of a company's CSR initiative truly means the stakeholder definition CSR and how much is merely philanthropy or marketing. Design/methodology/approach - The paper examines the GRI reporting guidelines for applicability to CSR principles, and explains the key elements of the economic, environmental, social, society, and product responsibility performance indicators. Findings - Examples of how companies have used the indicators to report data on GRI's website are provided as evidence that the distinctions made by the performance indicators indicate levels of adherence to CSR principles. Originality/value - Given the increased demand for accountability for the actions of companies toward their stakeholders, particularly the environment, using the GRI's performance indicators can continue dialogue on how CSR programs are evaluated by the ethics community, the public, and business.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 75
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Cadbury, 2011, OUR VAL
  • [2] Commission on Human Rights Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, 2004, WORK GROUP IND POP 2
  • [3] CSR, 2011, CORP SOC RESP SURV T
  • [4] TOWARD A UNIFIED CONCEPTION OF BUSINESS ETHICS - INTEGRATIVE SOCIAL CONTRACTS THEORY
    DONALDSON, T
    DUNFEE, TW
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (02) : 252 - 284
  • [5] ENGARDIO P., 2007, BUSINESSWEEK
  • [6] Ford Inc, 2010, FORD SUST REP 2010 1
  • [7] Freeman R.E., 1994, BUSINESS ETHICS Q, V4, P409, DOI [10.2307/3857340, DOI 10.2307/3857340]
  • [8] Corporate Social Responsibility theories:: Mapping the territory
    Garriga, E
    Melé, DN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2004, 53 (1-2) : 51 - 71
  • [9] Global Reporting Initiative-GRI, 2012, LAT GUID
  • [10] GRI, 2012, STAND DISCL 2