Safety and effectiveness of different dosage of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine fibroids: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

被引:13
|
作者
Carbonell, Josep Ll [1 ]
Acosta, Rita [2 ]
P, Yasmiriam Rez [2 ]
Marrero, Ana G. [2 ]
Trellez, Edilia [2 ]
Sanchez, Carlos [2 ]
Tomasi, Giuseppe [3 ]
机构
[1] Mediterranea Med Clin, C-14 Salvador Guinot, Valencia 46017, Spain
[2] Eusebio Hernandez Gynecol & Obstet Teaching Hosp, Havana, Cuba
[3] Univ Basque Country, San Sebastian, Spain
关键词
mifepristone; leiomyoma; fibroid; antiprogestins;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S33125
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and improvement in quality of life using 10 mg and 5 mg daily doses of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Design: The research was a randomized double- blind clinical study undertaken at the Eusebio Hernandez Hospital in Havana, Cuba. Subjects and methods: Seventy subjects with symptomatic uterine fibroids took one daily capsule of 10 mg or 5 mg mifepristone orally for 9 months. One to three endometrial biopsies were performed. In evaluating safety, the variables studied were endometrial changes associated with mifepristone, elevation of hepatic transaminases, side effects of mifepristone, and instances and duration of irregular bleeding. Results: There were 30/49 (61.2%) and 13/24 (54.2%) diagnoses of endometrial changes associated with mifepristone in the 10 mg and 5 mg groups, respectively (P = 0.282). At every evaluation visit the average endometrial thickness was significantly greater in the 10 mg group than in the 5 mg group (P = 0.013, P = 0.002, and P = 0.013, respectively). Only five subjects had slight elevations in their hepatic transaminases after 9 months' treatment. Sixteen of 35 (45.7%) and eight of 33 (24.2%) subjects had the occasional hot flush in the 10 mg and 5 mg groups, respectively (P= 0.032). In total, there were 12.9 +/- 4.6 (n = 21) and 9.1 +/- 3.9 (n = 18) days of irregular bleeding in the 10 mg and 5 mg groups, respectively (P = 0.009). Conclusion: According to the study findings, a 5 mg daily dose over 9 months has a relatively better safety profile than the 10 mg dose.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Concentrations of Ketamine and Propofol Combinations in Cataract Surgery: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Shetabi, Hamidreza
    Heydari, Seyed Morteza
    Shafa, Amir
    Peyman, Alireza
    Najafiani, Maryam
    GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 11
  • [42] Mifepristone for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Carbonell Esteve, Josep Lluis
    Acosta, Rita
    Heredia, Braulio
    Perez, Yasmiriam
    Yero Castaneda, Maria C.
    Valle Hernandez, Aleta
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (05): : 1029 - 1036
  • [43] Safety and effectiveness of diclofenac sodium in assisted reproduction treatment: a randomized prospective double-blind study
    Kailasam, C.
    Hunt, L. P.
    Ryder, I.
    Bhakri, I.
    Gordon, U. D.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 16 (05) : 724 - 729
  • [44] Evaluating the Effectiveness of Probiotic Supplementation in Combination With Doxycycline for the Treatment of Moderate Acne: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial
    Atefi, Najmolsadat
    Mohammadi, Masoumeh
    Bodaghabadi, Mohammad
    Mehrali, Marjan
    Behrangi, Elham
    Ghassemi, Mohammadreza
    Jafarzadeh, Alireza
    Goodarzi, Azadeh
    JOURNAL OF COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY, 2025, 24 (01)
  • [45] Clinical effectiveness and safety of cetirizine versus rupatadine in chronic spontaneous urticaria: a randomized, double-blind, 6-week trial
    Dakhale, Ganesh N.
    Shinde, Abhijit T.
    Mahatme, Mohini S.
    Hiware, Sachin K.
    Mishra, Dharmendra B.
    Mukhi, Jayesh I.
    Salve, Anoop M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 53 (05) : 643 - 649
  • [46] The prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial in orthopaedic surgery
    Clark, CR
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (08): : 1119 - 1120
  • [47] A randomized, double-blind trial of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of clozapine
    Rosenheck, R
    Charney, D
    Cramer, J
    Xu, WC
    Thomas, J
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (1-2) : 188 - 188
  • [48] Lidocaine for systemic sclerosis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Riera, Rachel
    Andrade, Luis E. C.
    Souza, Alexandre W. S.
    Kayser, Cristiane
    Yanagita, Edison T.
    Trevisani, Virginia F. M.
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2011, 6
  • [49] Reduction of postoperative pain: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Browning, WD
    Johnson, WW
    Gregory, PN
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 128 (12): : 1661 - 1667
  • [50] Iontophoresis in lateral epicondylitis: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial
    da Luz, Dionei C.
    de Borba, Yacom
    Ravanello, Emerson M.
    Daitx, Rodrigo B.
    Dohnert, Marcelo B.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (09) : 1743 - 1749