APPLYING BAKHTIN SCHOLARSHIP ON DISCOURSE IN EDUCATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW ESSAY

被引：56
作者：
Matusov, Eugene [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Delaware, Sch Educ, Newark, DE 19716 USA
来源：
EDUCATIONAL THEORY | 2007年 / 57卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00253.x
中图分类号：
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号：
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要：
Recently, Bakhtinian philologists have charged scholars of education with misapplying Bakhtin's scholarship in their field. In this critical essay, Eugene Matusov reviews two recent edited collections relevant to this issue: Arnetha F. Ball and Sarah Warshauer Freedman's Bakhtinian Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and Learning and Bonny Norton and Kelleen Toohey's Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning. He uses these texts to consider whether Bakhtin has been misapplied in education, how and whether Bakhtin's literary scholarship can be useful for education, and how education can inform Bakhtinian scholarship. Matusov shows that the philologists' critique of educational scholars is grounded but unjustifiably all-encompassing. Finally, he problematizes whether Bakhtin's notions of dialogism and internally persuasive discourse are compatible with institutionalized education.
引用
收藏
页码：215 / 237
页数：23
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1989, HARVARD EDUC REV, V59, P73
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1990, M BAKHTIN CREATION P
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1992, YOU CANT SAY YOU CAN
  • [4] Bakhtin, 2010, SPEECH GENRES OTHER
  • [5] Bakhtin M.M., 1985, FORMAL METHOD LIT SC, P14
  • [6] Bakhtin M.M., 1991, DIALOGIC IMAGINATION, P342
  • [7] Bakhtin M. M., 2004, J RUSSIAN E EUROPEAN, V42, P12, DOI [10.1080/10610405.2004.11059233, DOI 10.1080/10610405.2004.11059233]
  • [8] Bakhtin M. M., 1999, PROBLEMS DOSTOEVSKYS, V8
  • [9] Baumrind D., 1971, CURRENT PATTERNS PAR
  • [10] Burbules N. C., 1993, DIALOGUE TEACHING TH
1234