Benchmarking agility assessment approaches: a case study

被引:20
作者
Vinodh, S. [1 ]
Aravindraj, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Prod Engn, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Performance measurement; Benchmarking; Agility; Agile production;
D O I
10.1108/BIJ-04-2013-0037
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to benchmark the assessment approaches of agility in a manufacturing organization. Design/methodology/approach - The criteria for agility assessment were identified comprehensively based on literature review. The agility assessment was done using Multi Grade Fuzzy and Fuzzy logic approaches, and the results were benchmarked. Findings - Based on Multi Grade Fuzzy approach, the agility index was found to be 6.6; Fuzzy logic approach reveals the agility index as (5.37, 6.91, 8.45) which indicated the case organization is agile. The gaps were identified from both the approaches and the results were corroborated. Research limitations/implications - In the present study, Multi Grade Fuzzy and Fuzzy logic approaches were only benchmarked. Also, the benchmarking exercise was done only in one manufacturing organization. Originality/value - The benchmarking study between two approaches for agility assessment was found to be original and adds value to the agility assessment field.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 17
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Development of a Conceptual Benchmarking Framework for Healthcare Facilities Management: Case Study of Shanghai Municipal Hospitals [J].
Li, Yongkui ;
Cao, Lingyan ;
Han, Yilong ;
Wei, Jianjun .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 146 (01)
[32]   Benchmarking the risk assessment in green supply chain using fuzzy approach to FMEA Insights from an Indian case study [J].
Mangla, Sachin Kumar ;
Luthra, Sunil ;
Jakhar, Suresh .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (08) :2660-2687
[33]   Framework and determinants of benchmarking: a theoretical analysis and case study in Vietnam [J].
Viet Hoang ;
Khanh-Duy Nguyen ;
Hoang-Le Nguyen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2023, 18 (10) :4651-4668
[34]   Flexible Benchmarking Approach of Talent Management: A Case Study of MIDHANI [J].
Likhi, D. K. ;
Sabita, C. ;
Rao, Akanksha .
GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS, FLEXIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, :133-143
[35]   Selecting COTS information systems: A case study using benchmarking [J].
Hagge, L ;
Kreutzkamp, J .
7TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL XII, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS: II, 2003, :401-406
[36]   A case study of network benchmarking: How efficient is your network? [J].
Chang, JH .
8TH WORLD MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL I, PROCEEDINGS: INFORMATION SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2004, :293-298
[37]   Benchmarking performance of irrigation schemes: A case study from Turkey [J].
Cakmak, B ;
Beyribey, M ;
Yildirim, YE ;
Kodal, S .
IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2004, 53 (02) :155-163
[38]   Benchmarking Best Practices in Youth Associations in Malaysia: A Case Study [J].
Tamam, Ezhar ;
Nor, Zanariah Mohd ;
Yaacob, Zamree .
PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, 2005, 13 (02) :147-158
[39]   Benchmarking as an Assessment Tool for Cataloging [J].
Mugridge, Rebecca L. ;
Poehlmann, Nancy M. .
TECHNICAL SERVICES QUARTERLY, 2015, 32 (02) :141-159
[40]   Agility assessment in female futsal and soccer players [J].
Benvenuti, Cinzia ;
Minganti, Carlo ;
Condello, Giancarlo ;
Capranica, Laura ;
Tessitore, Antonio .
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2010, 46 (06) :415-420