SEE HOW THEY READ - COMPREHENSION MONITORING OF L1 AND L2 READERS

被引:120
作者
BLOCK, EL
机构
[1] Baruch College, The City University of New York
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3587008
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper illustrates the comprehension-monitoring process used by first and second language readers of English as they read expository prose. The think-aloud protocols of 25 college freshmen were collected. Sixteen (8 L1 and 8 L2 readers) were classified as proficient, 9 as nonproficient (3 L1 and 6 L2 readers). The monitoring process is discussed with respect to two specific problems: one involving a search for a referent, the other, a vocabulary problem. Three phases and six specific steps are defined: evaluation phase (problem recognition and problem source identification), action phase (strategic plan and action/solution attempt), and checking phase (check and revision). The responses indicated that monitoring was most thorough with the referent problem when the problem was explicitly signaled. The process was somewhat truncated with the vocabulary problem. Proficient L2 readers performed similarly to proficient L1 readers; less proficient L2 readers performed similarly to less proficient L1 readers. Although the general trends shown in L1 research were supported, there were some discrepancies in developmental trends. Caution is advised in applying the results of L1 research to L2 readers.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 343
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Developmental word recognition: A study of L1 English readers of L2 Japanese [J].
Chikamatsu, N .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2006, 90 (01) :67-85
[32]   Refusals in Chinese: How Do L1 and L2 Differ? [J].
Hong, Wei .
FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2011, 44 (01) :122-136
[33]   A Study of the Relationship between L1 Prior Knowledge and L2 Listening Comprehension [J].
Wang Feifeng .
PROCEEDINGS OF 2011 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS AND ENGLISH LEARNING, 2012, :185-189
[34]   The Effects of CALL versus Traditional L1 Glosses on L2 Reading Comprehension [J].
Taylor, Alan .
CALICO JOURNAL, 2006, 23 (02) :309-318
[35]   Quantitative and qualitative aspects of L1 (Swedish) and L2 (English) idiom comprehension [J].
Karlsson, Monica .
STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING, 2013, 3 (02) :293-319
[36]   Use of L1 in L2 reading comprehension among tertiary ESL learners [J].
Seng, Goh Hock ;
Hashim, Fatimah .
READING IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE, 2006, 18 (01) :29-54
[37]   Toward independent L2 readers: Effects of text adjuncts, subject knowledge, L1 reading, and L2 proficiency [J].
Brantmeier, Cindy ;
Sullivan, JoAnn Hammadou ;
Strube, Michael .
READING IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE, 2014, 26 (02) :34-53
[38]   L2 x L2 → L1 boundedness criteria [J].
Grafakos, Loukas ;
He, Danqing ;
Slavikova, Lenka .
MATHEMATISCHE ANNALEN, 2020, 376 (1-2) :431-455
[39]   The role of L1 reading ability, L2 proficiency and non-verbal intelligence in L2 reading comprehension [J].
Morvay, Gabriella .
ARGENTINIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2015, 3 (01) :26-47
[40]   The effects of accessing L1 versus L2 definitional glosses on L2 learners' reading comprehension and vocabulary learning [J].
Arpaci, Dilara .
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2016, 2 (01) :15-29