THE MEMORIAL SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT SCALE - AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE EVALUATION OF SYMPTOM PREVALENCE, CHARACTERISTICS AND DISTRESS

被引:1217
作者
PORTENOY, RK
THALER, HT
KORNBLITH, AB
LEPORE, JM
FRIEDLANDERKLAR, H
KIYASU, E
SOBEL, K
COYLE, N
KEMENY, N
NORTON, L
SCHER, H
机构
[1] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR,DEPT EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,DIV BIOSTAT,NEW YORK,NY 10021
[2] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR,DEPT NEUROL,PSYCHIAT SERV,NEW YORK,NY 10021
[3] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR,DEPT MED,NEW YORK,NY 10021
关键词
SYMPTOMS; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; SCALE DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; SYMPTOM DISTRESS;
D O I
10.1016/0959-8049(94)90182-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) is a new patient-rated instrument that was developed to provide multidimensional information about a diverse group of common symptoms. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the MSAS in the cancer population. Randomly selected inpatients and outpatients (n=246) with prostate, colon, breast or ovarian cancer were assessed using the MSAS and a battery of measures that independently evaluate phenomena related to quality of life. Symptom prevalence in the 218 evaluable patients ranged from 73.9% for lack of energy to 10.6% for difficulty swallowing. Based on a content analysis, three symptoms were deleted and two were added; the revised scale evaluates 32 physical and psychological symptoms. A factor analysis of variance yielded two factors that distinguished three major symptom groups and several subgroups. The major groups comprised psychological symptoms (PSYCH), high prevalence physical symptoms (PHYS H), and low prevalence (PHYS L). Internal consistency was high in the PHYS H and PSYCH groups (Cronback alpha coefficients of 0.88 and 0.83, respectively), and moderate in the PHYS L group (alpha = 0.58). Although the severity, frequency and distress dimensions were highly intercorrelated, canonical correlations and other analyses demonstrated that multidimensional assessment (frequency and distress) augments information about the impact of the symptoms. High correlations with clinical status and quality of life measures support the validity of the MSAS and indicate the utility of several subscale scores, including PSYCH, PHYS, and a brief Global Distress Index. The MSAS is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. It provides a method for comprehensive symptom assessment that may be useful when information about symptoms is desirable, such as clinical trials that incorporate quality of life measures or studies of symptom epidemiology.
引用
收藏
页码:1326 / 1336
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] Nunnally J., 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC METHODS, V2nd
  • [32] QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT IN A HOME CARE PROGRAM FOR ADVANCED CANCER-PATIENTS - A STUDY USING THE SYMPTOM DISTRESS SCALE
    PERUSELLI, C
    CAMPORESI, E
    COLOMBO, AM
    CUCCI, M
    MAZZONI, G
    PACI, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1993, 8 (05) : 306 - 311
  • [33] CLINICAL SYMPTOMS AND LENGTH OF SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH TERMINAL CANCER
    REUBEN, DB
    MOR, V
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 148 (07) : 1586 - 1591
  • [34] QUALITY-OF-LIFE ASSESSMENT - PATIENT COMPLIANCE WITH QUESTIONNAIRE COMPLETION
    SADURA, A
    PATER, J
    OSOBA, D
    LEVINE, M
    PALMER, M
    BENNETT, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1992, 84 (13) : 1023 - 1026
  • [35] MEASURING THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF CANCER-PATIENTS - THE FUNCTIONAL LIVING INDEX, CANCER - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    SCHIPPER, H
    CLINCH, J
    MCMURRAY, A
    LEVITT, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1984, 2 (05) : 472 - 483
  • [36] THE MOS SHORT-FORM GENERAL HEALTH SURVEY - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY IN A PATIENT POPULATION
    STEWART, AL
    HAYS, RD
    WARE, JE
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1988, 26 (07) : 724 - 732
  • [37] THE STRUCTURE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS AND WELL-BEING IN GENERAL POPULATIONS
    VEIT, CT
    WARE, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 51 (05) : 730 - 742
  • [38] WELCH J M, 1991, Palliative Medicine, V5, P46, DOI 10.1177/026921639100500109
  • [39] WRE JE, 1979, HLTH INSURANCE STUDY, V3
  • [40] YATES JW, 1980, CANCER, V40, P2222