Pro-market reforms, constitutional rigidity and judicial review: Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay in comparative perspective

被引：0

作者：

Correa, Izabela Moreira ^{[1
,2
]}

Amaral, Vanizia Goncalves ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Estado Saude Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Ciencia Polit, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

来源：

REVISTA DO SERVICO PUBLICO | 2006年 / 57卷 / 02期

关键词：

pro-market reforms; constitutional flexibility; judicial review;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];

学科分类号：

12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;

摘要：

This paper addresses the importance of the distribution of agenda and veto powers among citizens and the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary powers in order to allow the implementation of pro-market reforms in Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay. In comparative perspective, the paper deals with the issues of constitutional flexibility, law formation dynamics and the presence or absence of judicial review. The main hypothesis in this paper is that the harder it is for the Constitution to be altered, the harder it is to design the political game to implement reforms. The reforms of the social security systems implemented in Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay exemplified our analysis.

引用

页码：149 / 168

页数：20