Quality management in general surgery: a review of the literature

被引:5
作者
Beuran, Mircea [1 ,2 ]
Negoi, Ionut [1 ,2 ]
Paun, Sorin [1 ,2 ]
Vartic, Mihaela [2 ]
Stoica, Bogdan [2 ]
Tanase, Ioan [2 ]
Negoi, Ruxandra Irina [1 ,3 ]
Hostiuc, Sorin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Emergency Hosp Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
[3] Univ Med & Pharm Carol Davilla, Embryol Dept, Bucharest, Romania
[4] Natl Inst Legal Med Mina Minovici, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
Quality management; Healthcare; General surgery; Trauma;
D O I
10.1016/S2221-6189(14)60057-3
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Total quality management is a systematic approach focused on satisfying customers' expectations, identifying problems, analytically solving patient's problems and to implement continuous quality improvement. Method: Systematic review of the English language medical literature, using electronic search of the Pubmed, ProQuest and ScienceDirect databases with different combinations of the keywords: total quality management, healthcare, trauma, and minimally invasive surgery. Results: The assessment of outcomes in surgery represents a part of the quality assurance of patients' care. Usually, the surgeons have their own set of mental variables that can predict good and bad outcomes Surveys of complication rates and outcome are a poor substitute for quality control. For the reported complications it is impossible to know which complications are real (inherent to surgery and unavoidable) and which are a consequence of a mistake or an error in judgment. For polytrauma patients, optimal outcome requires an initial management fulfilling a high standard of quality assurance. A prerequisite is the availability of adequate resources at all times, including personnel, technical equipment, and special designed emergency room. Conclusions: Romanian hospitals need a more aggressive implementation of total quality management policy, in order to maintain their competitiveness on nowadays European Union competitive market.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 257
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]   Quality measurement of outcome in general surgery revisited - Commentary and proposal [J].
Shuhaiber, JH .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2002, 137 (01) :52-54
[22]  
Spath P, 2009, INTRO HEALTHCARE QUA
[23]   Trauma Center Quality Improvement Programs in the United States, Canada, and Australasia [J].
Stelfox, Henry T. ;
Straus, Sharon E. ;
Nathens, Avery ;
Gruen, Russell L. ;
Hameed, Syed M. ;
Kirkpatrick, Andrew .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 256 (01) :163-169
[24]   Trauma center volume and quality improvement programs [J].
Stelfox, Henry T. ;
Khandwala, Farah ;
Kirkpatrick, Andrew W. ;
Santana, Maria Jose .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 72 (04) :962-967
[25]   Quality Indicators for Evaluating Trauma Care A Scoping Review [J].
Stelfox, Henry Thomas ;
Bobranska-Artiuch, Barbara ;
Nathens, Avery ;
Straus, Sharon E. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2010, 145 (03) :286-295
[26]   The need for the introduction of quality management into Greek health care [J].
Theodorakioglou, YD ;
Tsiotras, GD .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 2000, 11 (08) :1153-1165
[27]  
Townes C, 1995, Swiss Surg, P15
[28]   Interpreting process indicators in trauma care: Construct validity versus confounding by indication [J].
Willis, Cameron D. ;
Stoelwinder, Johannes U. ;
Cameron, Peter A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 20 (05) :331-338