Why Are We Stuck on Tape and Suture? A Review of Catheter Securement Devices

被引：40

作者：

Frey, Anne Marie ^{[1
]}

Schears, Gregory J. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Childrens Hosp, Vasc Access Serv Team 4, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA

[2] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING | 2006年 / 29卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1097/00129804-200601000-00007

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

This review focuses on available prospective data comparing standard methods of catheter securement with a securement device. The data demonstrate that the device, specifically engineered for catheter securement, significantly reduces overall catheter-associated complications. This appears to be the result of improved securement and reduced catheter motion. These studies make the authors question their current practice of securing catheters with tape and suture when better alternatives are available.

引用

页码：34 / 38

页数：5

共 7 条

[1] The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. II. Long-term devices [J].

Crnich, CJ ;

Maki, DG .

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (10) :1362-1368

[2]

Royer T, 2003, J ASS VASC ACCESS, V8, P1

[3]

Schears GJ, 2001, JCAHO PATIENT SAFETY, P28

[4]

Sheppard K, 1999, J Intraven Nurs, V22, P151

[5]

Wood D, 1997, J Intraven Nurs, V20, P280

[6]

WOOD D, 1997, J VASCULAR ACCESS DE, V2, P11

[7] Sutureless securement device reduces complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters [J].

Yamamoto, AJ ;

Solomon, JA ;

Soulen, MC ;

Tang, J ;

Parkinson, K ;

Lin, R ;

Schears, GJ .

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (01) :77-81

← 1 →