INHIBITORY EFFECT ON STREPTOCOCCUS-MUTANS BY FLUORIDE TREATED CONVENTIONAL AND RESIN-REINFORCED GLASS-IONOMER CEMENTS

被引：38

作者：

SEPPA, L

KORHONEN, A

NUUTINEN, A

机构：

[1] Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kuopio

来源：

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES | 1995年 / 103卷 / 03期

关键词：

FLUORIDE; GLASS IONOMER;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00022.x

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

The aim of the present study was to study the effect of fluoride gel treatment on fluoride release and inhibition of acid production of Streptococcus mutans by different glass ionomer cements. Test slabs of four glass ionomer materials were fitted into the bottom of a test tube. A layer of S. mutans cells was centrifuged onto the test slabs, and the specimens were incubated for 4 h in 1.7% sucrose solution. Incubations were made using fresh: aged (29 d), aged and F-treated (1.25% F-geI), and aged, F-treated and aged samples (n=15 per group). After each incubation, pH and F contents of the fluid phase were determined, The freshly mixed glass ionomer samples released large amounts of fluoride, and the pH fall in the fluid phase was significantly inhibited. For aged samples, the fluoride release decreased strongly and no inhibitory effect on acid production by S. mutans was seen. After application of fluoride gel, fluoride release and inhibitory effect were significantly higher than initially for all glass ionomer cements. In conclusion, all glass ionomer cements were able to take up fluoride and subsequently release it, which resulted in reestablishment of their antibacterial effect. The patterns of fluoride release and antibacterial action were virtually the same for conventional and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cements.

引用

页码：182 / 185

页数：4

共 19 条

[1]

Tobias RS, Browne RM, Wilson CA., Antibacterial activity of dental restorative materials, Int Endod J, 18, pp. 161-171, (1985)

[2]

Meryon SD, Johnson SG., The modified model cavity method for assessing antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials, J Dent Res, 68, pp. 835-839, (1989)

[3]

Deschepper EJ, White RR, Von, Antibacterial effects of glass ionomers, Am J Dent, 2, pp. 51-56, (1989)

[4]

Palenik CJ, Behnen MJ, Setcos JC, Miller CH., Inhibition of microbial adherence and growth by various glass ionomers, in vitro. Dent Mater, 8, pp. 16-20, (1992)

[5]

Berg JH, Farrel JE, Brown LR., Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth on mutans streptococci, Pediatric Dent, 12, pp. 20-23, (1990)

[6]

Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets-Happonen S, Seppa L, Luoma H., Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite, Caries Res, 25, pp. 454-458, (1991)

[7]

Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues, Cury JA., In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement, Caries Res, 27, pp. 280-284, (1993)

[8]

Svanberg M, Mjor IA, ORstavik D., Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite and glass ionomer restorations, J Dent Res, 69, pp. 861-864, (1990)

[9]

McCourt JW, Cooley RL, Huddleston AM., Fluoride release from fluoride‐containing liners/bases, Quintessence Int, 21, pp. 41-45, (1990)

[10]

Mitra SB, In vitro fluoride release from a light‐cured glass ionomer liner/base, J Dent Res, 70, pp. 75-78, (1991)

← 1 2 →