Academic dishonesty and misconduct: Curbing plagiarism in the Muslim world

被引:0
作者
Moten, Abdul Rashid [1 ]
机构
[1] IIUM, Int Inst Islamic Thought & Civilizat, Polit Sci, Gombak, Malaysia
关键词
Academic integrity; honour codes; Muslim scholars; plagiarism; Turnitin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
Plagiarism is the theft of someone's ideas or language, and is a form of cheating which is morally and ethically unacceptable. This study analyses the nature of plagiarism from an Islamic perspective and its prevalence in institutions of higher learning in the Muslim world, especially among faculty members. It also examines the ways in which universities attempt to minimise or marginalise plagiarism. This study is warranted by the fact that there is relatively very little research on the issue of plagiarism at universities in the Muslim world and that existing research seldom addresses the issue of academics engaged in such unethical practices. Based upon existing surveys, interviews, and documentary sources, the study found that in earlier periods, standards were not inevitably lower than those that exist today and that the scope for condemning plagiarists has always existed. It also found that despite Islam's loathing, the incidence of plagiarism has grown significantly among Muslim students and faculty members in the Muslim world. The response to plagiarism varies from country to country. Some Muslim countries tolerate plagiarism, while others are taking steps to curb it. Institutions in Malaysia approach the problem of plagiarism as a matter of morality and crime that emphasise the need to develop writing and researching skills. They resort to honour codes, emphasise law and enforcement, and teach ways to write and cite. However, the success of these methods needs to be further probed.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 189
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Academic integrity or academic misconduct? Conceptual difficulties in higher education and the potential contribution of student demographic factors
    Harrad, R.
    Keasley, R.
    Jefferies, L.
    HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 43 (07) : 1556 - 1570
  • [42] Plagiarism: an eradicable misconduct? Reflection on the phenomenon in sports sciences
    Sousa, Tiago
    Esteves, Dulce
    Marques, Mario
    RETOS-NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EDUCACION FISICA DEPORTE Y RECREACION, 2022, (43): : 586 - 590
  • [43] Rethinking the relationship between plagiarism and academic integrity
    Jamieson, Sandra
    Howard, Rebecca Moore
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 16 (02): : 69 - 85
  • [44] Describing the Attributional Nature of Academic Dishonesty
    Marcus A. Henning
    Yan Chen
    Sanya Ram
    Phillipa Malpas
    Medical Science Educator, 2019, 29 : 577 - 581
  • [45] Cognitive dissonance in dealing with plagiarism in academic writing
    Law, Lily
    Ting, Su-Hie
    Jerome, Collin
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2013, 97 : 278 - 284
  • [46] The Cultural Context of Plagiarism and Research Misconduct in the Asian Region
    Rodrigues, Flinta
    Gupta, Prakash
    Khan, Afzal Parvez
    Chatterjee, Tulika
    Sandhu, Nimrat Kaur
    Gupta, Latika
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (12)
  • [47] Plagiarism and Self plagiarism from the perspective of academic authors
    Pocock, Lesley
    Rezaeian, Mohsen
    WORLD FAMILY MEDICINE, 2016, 14 (04): : 28 - 33
  • [48] Good mentoring as an approach to preventing academic misconduct
    Andres, Doerte
    Moritz, Marie-Theres
    Oestreicher, Wencke
    INFORMATION-WISSENSCHAFT UND PRAXIS, 2014, 65 (01): : 3 - 8
  • [49] Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review
    Parnther, Ceceilia
    JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND LEADERSHIP STUDIES, 2020, 1 (01): : 25 - 45
  • [50] Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study
    Stretton, Serina
    Bramich, Narelle J.
    Keys, Janelle R.
    Monk, Julie A.
    Ely, Julie A.
    Haley, Cassandra
    Woolley, Mark J.
    Woolley, Karen L.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2012, 28 (10) : 1575 - 1583