Searle and the literal meaning

被引:0
作者
Acero, Juan Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Dept Filosofia, Granada, Spain
来源
REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA-MADRID | 2006年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
Literal meaning; use; context; background; contrasting utterance; contrasting focus;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In his analysis of literal meaning Searle has deployed the principle that in carrying out an speech act the literal meaning of its words leaves undetermined the speech act's content. It is argued that this principle not only goes against certain basic linguistic intuitions, but it also leads to unnecessary convoluted analysis of phenomena like the existence of non-articulated constituents and semantic transference. Lastly, it is shown that by putting together ideas of Wittgenstein and Dretske better explanations of those phenomena can be obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 30
页数:22
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS INVESTIGATION
[2]  
Bach K., 1994, FDN SPEECH ACT THEOR
[3]  
Bach K., 2005, SEMANTICS VERSUS PRA
[4]  
BACH K, 2002, MEANING TRUTH INVEST
[5]  
Berg Jonathan, 1993, IYYUN, V42, P397
[6]   Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics [J].
Carston, R .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 2002, 17 (1-2) :127-148
[7]  
Carston R., 2002, THOUGHTS UTTERANCES
[8]  
DRETSKE F, 2000, PECEPTION KNOWLEDGE, P48
[9]   CONTRASTIVE STATEMENTS [J].
DRETSKE, FI .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1972, 81 (04) :411-437
[10]  
Glock HJ, 1996, DIALECTICA, V50, P205