KELSEN, THE IS-OUGHT DICHOTOMY AND NATURALISTIC FALLACY

被引：0

|

作者：

WROBLEWSKI, J

机构：

来源：

REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PHILOSOPHIE | 1981年 / 35卷 / 138期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：508 / 517

页数：10

相关论文

共 50 条

[31] IS-OUGHT - PRESCRIBING AND A PRESENT CONTROVERSY
SCHULTZ, JL
THOMIST, 1985, 49 (01): : 1 - 23
[32] Collective Acceptance and the Is-Ought Argument
Frank Hindriks
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2013, 16 : 465 - 480
[33] Relating the "Is-Ought Problem" to Nursing Inquiry
Carnevale, Franco A.
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2007, 39 (04) : 11 - 17
[34] The is-ought problem: An investigation in philosophical logic
Pigden, C
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2001, 79 (04) : 578 - 580
[35] 'Is', 'ought' and the voluntaristic fallacy
Hanfling, O
PHILOSOPHY, 1997, 72 (282) : 537 - 548
[36] Hans Kelsen's Concept of the 'Ought'
Alexy, Robert
JURISPRUDENCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL AND POLITICAL THOUGHT, 2013, 4 (02): : 235 - 245
[37] IS THERE A NATURALISTIC FALLACY
BAUMRIN, BH
AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 1968, 5 (02) : 79 - 89
[38] THE NATURALISTIC FALLACY
LANGE, JF
HUMANIST, 1957, 17 (04) : 210 - 217
[39] The Naturalistic Fallacy
Kemp, Dan
JOURNAL OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 19 (02) : 225 - 228
[40] Naturalistic fallacy
Kramer, MH
TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 1998, (4974): : 15 - 15

← 1 2 3 4 5 →