CORRELATION OF RADIOLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF LUMBAR SPINE FUSIONS WITH SURGICAL EXPLORATION

被引:176
作者
BRODSKY, AE
KOVALSKY, ES
KHALIL, MA
机构
[1] Texas Institute for Spinal Disorders, Houston, TX
[2] Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
关键词
LUMBAR SPINE FUSION; PSEUDOARTHROSIS; ROENTGENOGRAMS; TOMOGRAPHY; BENDING FILMS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC SCANS; SURGICAL EXPLORATION;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199106001-00017
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Although inspection of posterolateral lumbar fusion is the best method of determining its solidity, routine exploration of the fusion is somewhat impractical because of the morbidity and expense involved. Removal of internal fixation devices or implantable batteries or reoperation for failed back surgery enabled the exploration and assessment of lumbar spine fusions in 214 operations on 175 patients. The preoperative radiologic assessment (plain roentgenographs, polytomography, bending films, and computed tomographic scans) were correlated with surgical findings. This study indicated a significant percentage of inaccuracy of all radiologic modalities used. Noncorrelations were present in 36% of plain roentgenographs, 41% of polytomograms, 38% of bending films and 43% of computed tomographic scans. Radiologic inaccuracy was manifest on both the positive and negative sides. Computed tomographic scanning presented the lowest percentage of inaccuracy (22%) and bending films the highest percentage (27%). Based on these findings, there exists the need for more accurate noninvasive methods to determine the solidity of spine fusions.
引用
收藏
页码:S261 / S265
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Albee F.H., Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott’s disease: A preliminary report, JAMA, 42, pp. 885-886, (1911)
  • [2] Aurori B.F., Weierman R.J., Lowell H.A., Nadel Cl, Parsons JR: Pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion for scoliosis, Clinorthop, 199, pp. 153-158, (1985)
  • [3] Bosworth D.M., Techniques of spinal fusion: Pseudarthrosis and method of repair, AAOS Instructional Course Lecture V, pp. 295-313, (1948)
  • [4] Chafetz N., Cann C.E., Morris J.M., Steinbach L.S., Goldbert H.I., Pseudarthrosis following lumbar fusion: Detection by direct coronal CT scanning, Radiology, 162, 3, pp. 803-805, (1987)
  • [5] Clader T.J., Dawson E.G., Bassett L.W., The role of tomography in the evaluation of the postoperative spinal fusion, Spine, 9, pp. 686-689, (1984)
  • [6] Cleveland M., Bosworth D.M., Thompson F.R., Pseudarthrosis in the lumbosacral spine, J Bone Joint Surg, 30A, 2, pp. 302-312, (1948)
  • [7] Dawson E.G., Clader T.J., Bassett L.W., A comparison of different methods used to diagnose pseudarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis, J Bone Joint Surg, 67A, 8, pp. 1153-1159, (1985)
  • [8] Depalma A.F., Rothman R.H., The nature of pseudarthrosis, Clin Orthop, 59, pp. 113-118, (1968)
  • [9] Flatley T.J., Derderian H., Closed loop instrumentation of the lumbar spine, Clin Orthop, 196, pp. 273-278, (1985)
  • [10] Graham J.J., Pseudarthrosis in scoliosis: Routine exploration of forty-five operative cases, J Bone Joint Surg Proceedings, 50A, (1968)