Updating the Simulation Effectiveness Tool: Item Modifications and Reevaluation of Psychometric Properties

被引:157
作者
Leighton, Kim [1 ]
Ravert, Patricia
Mudra, Vickie [2 ]
Macintosh, Christopher
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Coll Nursing, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Simulation Effectiveness Tool; Tool Development; Simulated Clinical Experience;
D O I
10.5480/15-1671
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
AIM This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool (SET), the SET-M. BACKG ROUND The SET, developed in 2005, was updated to be consistent with INACSL Standards of Best Practice, QSEN practices, and American Association of Colleges of Nursing baccalaureate essentials. METHOD Undergraduate nursing students from two nursing programs, one with multiple campuses, completed the SET-M following completion of a simulated clinical experience; 1,288 students took part in the study. RESULTS Exploratory factor analysis was completed using unweighted least squares. Four subscales were identified with acceptable internal consistency: Prebriefing (alpha = .833), Learning (alpha = .852), Confidence (alpha = .913), and Debriefing (alpha = .908). CONCLUSION Revisions made to modify the SET to current standards of simulation practice have resulted in the SET-M, which has been shown to be a valid and reliable method of evaluating students' perceptions of the effectiveness of learning in the simulation environment.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 323
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ESS BACC ED PROF NUR
[2]   Technology-Enhanced Simulation for Health Professions Education A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Cook, David A. ;
Hatala, Rose ;
Brydges, Ryan ;
Zendejas, Benjamin ;
Szostek, Jason H. ;
Wang, Amy T. ;
Erwin, Patricia J. ;
Hamstra, Stanley J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 306 (09) :978-988
[3]   Quality and safety education for nurses [J].
Cronenwett, Linda ;
Sherwood, Gwen ;
Bornsteiner, Jane ;
Disch, Joanne ;
Johnson, Jean ;
Mitchell, Pamela ;
Sullivan, Dori Taylor ;
Warren, Judith .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2007, 55 (03) :122-131
[4]   Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard VI: The Debriefing Process [J].
Decker, Sharon ;
Fey, Mary ;
Sideras, Stephanie ;
Caballero, Sandra ;
Rockstraw, Leland ;
Boese, Teri ;
Franklin, Ashley E. ;
Gloe, Donna ;
Lioce, Lori ;
Sando, Carol R. ;
Meakim, Colleen ;
Borum, Jimmie C. .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2013, 9 (06) :S26-S29
[5]   Missing data in a multi-item instrument were best handled by multiple imputation at the item score level [J].
Eekhout, Iris ;
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
Twisk, Jos W. R. ;
Brand, Jaap P. L. ;
de Boer, Michiel R. ;
Heymans, Martijn W. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (03) :335-342
[6]  
Elfrink Cordi V.L., 2012, CLIN SIMUL NURS, V8, P199, DOI [10.1016/j.ecns.2011.12.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ECNS.2011.12.001]
[7]   Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard IV: Facilitation [J].
Franklin, Ashley E. ;
Boese, Teri ;
Gloe, Donna ;
Lioce, Lori ;
Decker, Sharon ;
Sando, Carol R. ;
Meakim, Colleen ;
Borum, Jimmie C. .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2013, 9 (06) :S19-S21
[8]  
Hayden JK, 2014, J NURS REGUL, V5, pS3
[9]  
International Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning Board of Directors, 2013, CLIN SIMUL NURS, V9, pS1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ECNS.2013.05.008
[10]  
Kardong-Edgren S., 2010, CLIN SIMUL NURS, V6, P25, DOI [10.1016/j.ecns.2009.08.004, DOI 10.1016/J.ECNS.2009.08.004]