Cytotoxic agents are detrimental to bone formed by distraction osteogenesis

被引:6
|
作者
Monsell, Fergal P. [1 ]
Barnes, James Ralph [1 ]
Bellemore, M. C. [2 ]
Biston, L. [3 ,4 ]
Goodship, Allen [5 ]
机构
[1] Bristol Royal Hosp Children, Dept Paediat Orthopaed Surg, Paul O Gorman Bldg,Upper Maudlin St, Bristol BS2 8BJ, Avon, England
[2] Royal Alexandra Hosp Children, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Prince Wales Med Res Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] UCL, Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, Inst Orthopaed & Musculoskeletal Sci, London, England
来源
STRATEGIES IN TRAUMA AND LIMB RECONSTRUCTION | 2013年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
Osteogenesis; External fixator; Cytotoxic; Chemotherapy; Rabbit; Tibia; Bone tumor;
D O I
10.1007/s11751-013-0179-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Distraction osteogenesis can be used to replace segmental bone loss when treating malignant bone tumors in children and adolescents. These patients often receive cytotoxic chemotherapy as part of their treatment regimen. The effect of cytotoxic drugs on the cellular processes during distraction osteogenesis and the structural and mechanical properties of regenerate bone is unknown. We therefore used a rabbit model of distraction osteogenesis to determine that cytotoxic agents had a detrimental effect on regenerate bone formed by this technique. We administered adriamycin and cisplatinum to 20 rabbits using two different simulated chemotherapy regimens. All rabbits underwent an osteotomy at 12 weeks of age. Distraction osteogenesis began 24 h later at a rate of 0.75 mm a day for 10 days, followed by 18 days without correction to allow for consolidation. Regenerate bone was assessed using plain radiographs, bone densitometry, and mechanical testing. Peri-operative chemotherapy decreased the mechanical properties of the regenerate with regard to yield strain (3.7 x 10(-2) vs. 5.2 x 10(-2)) and energy at yield (2.73 x 10(7) vs. 3.92 x 10(7)). Preoperative chemotherapy in isolation reduced bone mineral density (0.38 vs. 0.5 g/cm(2)), bone mineral content (0.24 vs. 0.36 g), and volumetric bone mineral density (0.57 vs. 0.65 g/cm(2)) with no alterations in the mechanical properties. Conclusions: Preoperative chemotherapy appears to decrease the volume of regenerate bone, without affecting structural integrity, suggesting that the callus formed is of good quality. The converse appears true for peri-operative chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 180
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcome of Mandibular Symphyseal Distraction Osteogenesis With Bone-Borne Devices
    Raoul, Gwenael
    Wojcik, Thomas
    Ferri, Joel
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 (02) : 488 - 493
  • [22] Predicting the outcome of distraction osteogenesis by 3-phase bone scintigraphy
    Kawano, M
    Taki, J
    Tsuchiya, H
    Tomita, K
    Tonami, N
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2003, 44 (03) : 369 - 374
  • [23] Systemic melatonin application increases bone formation in mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Acikan, Izzet
    Gul, Mehmet
    Artas, Gokhan
    Yaman, Ferhan
    Deniz, Gulnihal
    Bulmus, Ozgur
    Kom, Mustafa
    Kirtay, Mustafa
    Dundar, Serkan
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2018, 32
  • [24] Effects of Local Low-Dose Alendronate Injections Into the Distraction Gap on New Bone Formation and Distraction Rate on Distraction Osteogenesis
    Alp, Yunus Emre
    Taskaldiran, Alper
    Onder, Mustafa Ercument
    Karahan, Siyami
    Kocyigit, Ismail Doruk
    Atil, Fethi
    Tekin, Umut
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (08) : 2174 - 2178
  • [25] Complications associated with distraction osteogenesis for infected nonunion of the femoral shaft in the presence of a bone defect A RETROSPECTIVE SERIES
    Blum, A. L. L.
    Bongiovanni, J. C.
    Morgan, S. J.
    Flierl, M. A.
    dos Reis, F. Baldy
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (04): : 565 - 570
  • [26] Evaluation of augmented alveolar bone with vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis and implant installation
    Shet, Uttom Kumar
    Kook, Min-Suk
    Jung, Seunggon
    Oh, Hee-Kyun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2011, 37 (05) : 421 - 428
  • [27] COMP-angiopoietin-1 accelerates bone formation during distraction osteogenesis
    Park, Byung-Hyun
    Yoon, Sun Jung
    Jang, Kyu Yun
    Kim, Mi-Ran
    Lee, Hyung-Seok
    Kim, Ki-Bum
    Park, Hyuk
    Lee, Sang Yong
    Park, Ho Sung
    Lim, Seok Tae
    Song, Kyung-Jin
    Kim, Jung Ryul
    BONE, 2010, 46 (05) : 1442 - 1448
  • [28] Distraction osteogenesis for bone repair in the 21st century: Lessons learned
    Catagni, Maurizio A.
    Guerreschi, Francesco
    Lovisetti, Luigi
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (06): : 580 - 586
  • [29] Staphylococcal Enterotoxin C2 Expedites Bone Consolidation in Distraction Osteogenesis
    Xu, Jia
    Wu, Tianyi
    Sun, Yuxin
    Wang, Bin
    Zhang, Jinfang
    Lee, Wayne Yuk-Wai
    Chai, Yimin
    Li, Gang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2017, 35 (06) : 1215 - 1225
  • [30] Bone consolidation is enhanced by rhBMP-2 in a rabbit model of distraction osteogenesis
    Li, G
    Bouxsein, ML
    Luppen, C
    Li, XJ
    Wood, M
    Seeherman, HJ
    Wozney, JM
    Simpson, H
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2002, 20 (04) : 779 - 788