Erasing the Material Base of Occupy Wall Street: When Soft Means Fail

被引:0
作者
Leary, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensborough Community Coll, Dept English, New York, NY 11364 USA
来源
KOME-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE COMMUNICATION INQUIRY | 2015年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
surveillance; information control; policing; citizen movements; Occupy Wall Street;
D O I
10.17646/KOME.2015.24
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
When Occupy Wall Street proved able to reach mass circulation in 2011, it registered as a threat to the status quo in the United States, where corporate entities with close relation to government normally control the flow of discourse. The Occupy encampments, therefore, were intolerable, not merely an annoyance that could be ignored or ridiculed. Once Occupy's anti-corporate rhetoric had spread widely, the mainstream media took steps to derail the mass appeal of Occupy's oppositional discourse through accusations of incoherence and indecency. However, such "soft" means of organizing consent from the public were very weak in 2011 because of the 2008 economic collapse which had been provoked by Wall Street. With instruments of soft persuasion weak, the dominant group turned to instruments of hard persuasion arrests, harassments, beatings, random grabs, and finally the orchestrated assault carried out on November 15th, an operation that saw the media censored and sequestered, at night, in the dark, with no filmed images, and all subway stations and street access blocked.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 63
页数:20
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, NEW YORK POST
  • [2] Bagdikian B., 2004, NEW MEDIA MONOPOLY
  • [3] Baker A., 2011, CITY ROOM
  • [4] Barbaro Michael, 2011, NY TIMES
  • [5] Bellafante G., 2011, NEW YORK TIMES 1002
  • [6] Carr D., 2011, NY TIMES
  • [7] Croteau David, 1994, INVITATION ONLY MEDI
  • [8] Cuozzo Steve, 2011, NEW YORK POST
  • [9] Epstein E. A., 2011, METRO NEW YORK 1023
  • [10] Fairclough N., 2006, LANGUAGE GLOBALIZATI