LOGICAL CONDUCTISM AND SELF-KNOWLEDGE Plea in support of the first person

被引:0
作者
Gensollen, Mario [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Aguascalientes, Dept Filosofia, Aguascalientes, Mexico
来源
TOPICOS-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA | 2006年 / 31期
关键词
self-knowledge; logical conductism; Gilbert Ryle; Stanley Cavell; Ludwig Wittgenstein;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This article analyzes the problem of self-knowledge through two opposite postures: cartesian dualism and logical conductism. Is self-knowledge infallible, as Descartes thought? Or, rather, self-knowledge is only possible on third person's perspective? The goal is to show that the problem of self-knowledge only can be solved from the outside of a epistemological perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 134
页数:32
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] BECHTEL W, 1988, PHILOS MIND OVERVIEW
  • [2] BONJOUR L, 1978, AM PHILOS QUART, V15, P1
  • [3] Cavell Stanley, 1999, CLAIM REASON
  • [4] CAVELL Stanley, 1998, MUST WE MEAN WHAT WE, P4
  • [5] COOK John, 1966, WITTGENSTEIN COLLECT, P283
  • [6] Garcia Alfonso, 1988, INVESTIGACIONES FILO
  • [7] Garcia Carmen, 1994, TEORIAS FILOSOFIAS M
  • [8] HAMMER Espen, 2002, S CAVELL SKEPTICISM, P63
  • [9] MALEBRANCHE, 1923, DIALOGUES METAPHYSIC
  • [10] Neira Agustin, 2001, LA METAFORA VIVA