Minimally invasive surgical options for congenital and acquired uterine factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss

被引:11
作者
Bailey, Amelia P. [1 ]
Jaslow, Carolyn R. [2 ]
Kutteh, William H. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fertil Associates Memphis, Minimally Invas Surg, Memphis, TN 38120 USA
[2] Rhodes Coll, Dept Biol, Memphis, TN 38112 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[4] Fertil Associates Memphis, Ctr Study Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, Memphis, TN 38120 USA
关键词
acquired uterine anomaly; adenoma; congenital uterine anomaly; fibroid; minimally invasive surgery; miscarriage; polyp; recurrent pregnancy loss; septum; uterine adhesion;
D O I
10.2217/WHE.14.81
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as two or more failed clinical pregnancies before 20 weeks' gestation and may be caused by genetic, endocrinologic, anatomic and immunologic abnormalities. Anatomic uterine anomalies include congenital malformations (bicornuate, didelphic, septate and unicornuate uteri) and acquired defects (fibroids, adenomas, adhesions and polyps). Women with septate and bicornuate uteri, intrauterine adhesions, and some adenomas and fibroids are at increased risk of RPL. Data support surgical treatment of all of these lesions except bicornuate uteri. The role of polyps in RPL is unclear. Minimally invasive options for surgical correction of intrauterine lesions include hysteroscopy, laparoscopy with and without robotic assistance and minilaparotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 167
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy [J].
Advincula, AP ;
Song, A ;
Burke, W ;
Reynolds, RK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2004, 11 (04) :511-518
[2]   Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: A comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs [J].
Advincula, Arnold P. ;
Xu, Xiao ;
Goudeau, Suntrea ;
Ransom, Scott B. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) :698-705
[4]   Robotic-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Abdominal Myomectomy: A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes [J].
Barakat, Ehab E. ;
Bedaiwy, Mohamed A. ;
Zimberg, Stephen ;
Nutter, Benjamin ;
Nosseir, Mohsen ;
Falcone, Tommaso .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (02) :256-265
[5]   Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy [J].
Bedient, Carrie E. ;
Magrina, Javier F. ;
Noble, Brie N. ;
Kho, Rosanne M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) :566.e1-566.e5
[6]   Which patients benefit from a 3D reconstructed coronal view of the uterus added to standard routine 2D pelvic sonography? [J].
Benacerraf, Beryl R. ;
Shipp, Thomas D. ;
Bromley, Bryann .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (03) :626-629
[7]   Classic and Cutting-Edge Strategies for the Management of Early Pregnancy Loss [J].
Brezina, Paul R. ;
Kutteh, William H. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 41 (01) :1-+
[8]  
Droegemueller W, 2001, COMPREHENSIVE GYNECO, P497
[9]   Robot-assisted single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy: Initial report and technique [J].
Gargiulo A.R. ;
Bailey A.P. ;
Srouji S.S. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7 (2) :137-142
[10]   Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy Compared With Standard Laparoscopic Myomectomy [J].
Gargiulo, Antonio R. ;
Srouji, Serene S. ;
Missmer, Stacey A. ;
Correia, Katharine F. ;
Vellinga, Thomas ;
Einarsson, Jon I. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (02) :284-291