Political Liberalization and Agricultural Trade Policy in Indonesia and the Philippines

被引:2
作者
Laiprakobsup, Thanapan [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Dev Adm, Grad Sch Publ Adm, 118 Bunchana Atthakorn Bldg,Seri Thai Rd, Bangkok 10240, Thailand
关键词
Political liberalization; Agricultural trade policy; Nominal rate of assistance; Consumer tax equivalent; Indonesia; the Philippines;
D O I
10.1080/02185377.2013.879066
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The political regimes in Indonesia and the Philippines have experienced a political transition-from an authoritarian to an electoral system. Such a transition has contributed to changes in the policy-making process, including agricultural trade policy. Unfortunately, few scholars have empirically examined the impact of this political transition on the policy-making process. This article aims to fill this gap by examining the causal relations between political liberalization and agricultural trade policy in Indonesia and the Philippines in order to understand how political liberalization affects the policy-making process. It is hypothesized that the more liberalized the government becomes, the less likely it is to impose control programs on agriculture. Studying the government's intervention in the agricultural sector in Indonesia and the Philippines, it was found that liberal governments are likely to reduce the tax and price control programs imposed on the agricultural sector. This article implies that a liberal regime has a positive impact on rural farmers in that governments are less likely to implement policies that discriminate against farmers' interests.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Globalization, inequality, and local-level dynamics: Indonesia and the Philippines [J].
Hill, Hal .
ASIAN ECONOMIC POLICY REVIEW, 2008, 3 (01) :42-61
[22]   Political party and party system institutionalization in Southeast Asia: lessons for democratic consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand [J].
Ufen, Andreas .
PACIFIC REVIEW, 2008, 21 (03) :327-350
[24]   Putin, the Oligarchs & the End of Political Liberalization [J].
Goldman, Marshall, I .
ECONOMISTS VOICE, 2005, 2 (02)
[25]   Political economy of energy policy in Indonesia towards net zero emissions by 2060 [J].
Massagony, Alfian ;
Pandit, Ram ;
White, Benedict .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 88
[26]   Defending Foreign Policy at Home: Indonesia and the ASEAN-Based Free Trade Agreements [J].
Syarip, Rakhmat .
JOURNAL OF CURRENT SOUTHEAST ASIAN AFFAIRS, 2020, 39 (03) :405-427
[27]   Wage inequality associated with job status: Evidence from Indonesia and the Philippines [J].
Nguyen-Huu, Thanh Tam .
ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2023, 28 :57-79
[28]   Authoritarian diasporas in Indonesia and the Philippines: comparative perspectives on elite survival and defection [J].
Buehler, Michael ;
Nataatmadja, Ronnie .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2021, 28 (03) :521-538
[29]   ARGENTINA-INDONESIA: INCREASING TRADE INTERDEPENDENCE AND REVITALIZATION OF POLITICAL TIES (1999-2012) [J].
Florencia Rubiolo, Maria ;
Rodrigo Ramoneda, Ezequiel .
ASTROLABIO-NUEVA EPOCA, 2012, (09) :62-86
[30]   An Analysis of Value Added Tax Policy on the Delivery of Tobacco Products in Indonesia (A Comparative Study with South Africa and the Philippines) [J].
Putri, Tasya Armani ;
Murwendah, Murwendah .
EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH VISION 2020, 2019, :8125-8137