SERIAL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE STUDY ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF IMPINGEMENT ON THE MR IMAGE OF THE PATELLAR TENDON GRAFT

被引:68
作者
HOWELL, SM [1 ]
CLARK, JA [1 ]
FARLEY, TE [1 ]
机构
[1] N VALLEY MRI CT CTR,CHICO,CA
来源
ARTHROSCOPY | 1992年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
PATELLAR TENDON GRAFTS; KNEE; GRAFT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; IMPINGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/0749-8063(92)90067-L
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This study was designed to serially analyze the magnetic resonance (MR) appearance of patella tendon grafts during the first year of implantation, and to determine if the sagittal location of the tibial tunnel affects the MR appearance of the graft. An additional goal was to analyze the effect of the sagittal placement of the tibial tunnel placement on knee extension and stability. Two groups were defined by comparing the sagittal relationship of the tibial tunnel to the slope of the intercondylar roof from a lateral roentgenogram of the knee in full extension. The roof impinged group consisted of nine patients who had the tibial tunnel placed anterior to the tibial intersection of the slope of the intercondylar roof. The unimpinged group was composed of eleven patients who had the tibial tunnel placed posterior and parallel to the slope of the intercondylar roof. MR scans were obtained at 0-2, 12, 24, 36, and > 48 weeks postoperatively. The signal intensities of grafts in both groups were identical at 1 week, but increased in the impinged group by 3 months and remained increased at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.01). In contrast, the MR signal of grafts in the unimpinged group remained unchanged during the first year. Knees with impinged grafts had extension deficits but remained stable. Roof impingement was impossible to view directly with the knee in full extension. Positioning the tibial tunnel posterior and parallel to the slope of the intercondylar roof in the extended knee and using an impingement rod to indirectly assess roof impingement avoided the extension deficits and MR signal increases characteristic of an impinged graft. The clinical relevance is that the surgeon controls the MR appearance of the graft and the severity of extension deficits by deciding where to place the tibial tunnel and when to perform a roofplasty. Avoiding roof impingement is difficult because of the inability to directly judge the adequacy of a roofplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 358
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Moeser, Bechtold, Clark, Et al., MR imaging of anterior cruciate ligament repair, J Comp Assisted Tomogr, 13, pp. 105-109, (1989)
[2]  
Howell, Clark, Blasier, Serial magnetic resonance imaging of hamstring ACL autografts during the first year of implantation: A preliminary study, Am J Sports Med, 19, pp. 42-47, (1991)
[3]  
Howell, Berns, Farley, Signal intensity measurements of unimpinged and impinged anterior cruciate ligament grafts, Radiology, 179, pp. 639-643, (1991)
[4]  
Rak, Gillogly, Schaefer, Et al., Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Evaluation with MR imaging, Radiology, 178, pp. 553-556, (1991)
[5]  
Clancy, Nelson, Reider, Et al., Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using one-third patellar ligament, augmented by extra-articular tension transfers, J Bone Joint Surg, 64 A, pp. 352-359, (1982)
[6]  
Howell, Clark, Farley, A rationale for predicting anterior cruciate graft impingement by the intercondylar roof: an MRI study, Am J Sports Med, 19, pp. 276-281, (1991)
[7]  
Lysholm, Gillquist, Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale, Am J Sports Med, 10, pp. 150-154, (1982)
[8]  
Sachs, Daniel, Stone, Et al., Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Am J Sports Med, 17, pp. 760-765, (1989)
[9]  
Tanzer, Lenczer, The relationship of intercondylar notch size and content to notchplasty requirement in anterior cruciate ligament surgery, Arthroscopy, 6, pp. 89-93, (1990)
[10]  
Sidles, Larson, Garbini, Et al., Ligament length relationships in the moving knee, J Orthop Res, 6, pp. 593-610, (1988)