Judicial activism and a posteriori constraints

被引：13

作者：

Diniz Araujo, Luiz Henrique ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Fac Boa Viagem DeVry, Recife, PE, Brazil

来源：

REVISTA DE INVESTIGACOES CONSTITUCIONAIS-JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH | 2018年 / 5卷 / 01期

关键词：

judicial activism; constraints; precedents; incrementalism; Brazilian Supreme Court;

D O I：

10.5380/rinc.v5i1.56088

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This paper aims to analyze judicial activism, an expression that still demands a precise meaning in Brazilian legal literature. Firstly, the text exposes a couple of meanings the expression judicial activism may assume in Brazilian Law; it also explores the need of constraints to judicial activism other than mere interpretive ones. Thus, the text analyses a posteriori constraints, such as binding precedents and incrementalism. In its third part, the paper explores a Brazilian Supreme Court in emblematic case, connecting it to the theories and constraints previously exposed.

引用

页码：129 / 150

页数：22

共 20 条

[1]

ARAUJO Marcelo Labanca Correa de, 2015, JUSTICA CONSTITUCION, P40

[2]

BARAK Aharon, 2002, HARVARD LAW REV CAMB, P97

[3]

BARROSO Luis Roberto., 1990, DIREITO CONSTITUCION

[4]

CAMPOS Carlos, 2014, DIMENSOES ATIVISMO J

[5]

CARDOZO Benjamin Nathan, NATURE JUDICIAL PROC

[6]

CONTINENTINO Marcelo Casseb, 2012, REV INFORMACAO LEGIS, P141

[7]

DANTAS Ivo, 1994, CONSTITUICAO FEDERAL

[8] OBJECTIVITY AND INTERPRETATION [J].

FISS, OM .

STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 1982, 34 (04) :739-763

[9]

HOLMES OW, COMMON LAW

[10]

JUNIOR NOBRE, 2011, REV DIREITO ADMINIST, V11, P92

← 1 2 →