THE APORIA OF PLATO'S CRATYLUS DIALOGUE

被引:0
作者
Santos, Ivanaldo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UERN, Dept Filosofia, Sao Miguel, RN, Brazil
[2] UERN, Programa Posgrad, Sao Miguel, RN, Brazil
来源
ARCHAI-REVISTA DE ESTUDOS SOBRE AS ORIGENS DO PENSAMENTO OCIDENTAL | 2010年 / 4卷
关键词
Plato; Cratylus and Aporia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This short article does not intend to disagree with the philosophical tradition, which states that the Cratylus is an 'aporetic' dialogue. The aim of this paper is to raise the possibility that the Cratylus's true aporia is not the excluding antagonism of conventional view by Hermogenes and naturalistic theory by Cratylus, but the question of the relationship between language and knowledge. Like Plato asks: can you know things without the aid of language? For this question that matter he does not have an answer in Cratylus. Thus, the aporia is configured. To find an answer to it we must use other Platonic dialogues, such as Fedun, Tiimaeus and Sophist.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 106
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] ARAUJO DEOLIVEIRA Manfredo, 2001, REVIRAVOLTA LINGUIST
  • [2] Cratyle PLATAO., 1989, TRADUIT L MERIDIER
  • [3] DIAS Palmeira, 1994, INTRO CRATILO
  • [4] DIETZSCH Mary Julia Martins, 2007, REV INT HUMANITATS, V12, P47
  • [5] HILLESHEIM Valerio, 2001, FILOSOFIA LINGUAGEM, VVII, P245
  • [6] MEDEIROS Paulo Tarso Cabral, 1994, INFORM SOC-ESTUD, V4, P22
  • [7] MONTENEGRO Maria Aparecida de Paiva, 2007, KRITERION, V48
  • [8] PAVIANI Jayme, 1993, COLECAO FILOSOFIA, V3
  • [9] PEREIRA Americo, 2008, FILOSOFIA LINGUAGEM
  • [10] PIQUE Jorge Fero, 1996, LINGUAGEM REALIDADE, P171