Risk assessment in care and protection: The case for actuarial approaches

被引:0
作者
Lennings, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Behav & Community Hlth Sci, POB 170, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia
关键词
developmental psychology; child protection; psychological assessment; actuarial approaches; decision making;
D O I
10.5172/jamh.4.1.27
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The assessment of abuse is a highly emotionally charged activity. The requirement to provide an accountable and transparent assessment process requires the development of actuarial devices and clearly enunciated decision rules. Risk assessment requires the application of ecologically valid, evidence-based approaches. Such approaches, commonly transcribed into actuarial systems, are usually incorporated into a clinical reasoning approach. Whilst academic debate tends to highlight actuarial approaches as superior to approaches based on clinical experience, both common sense and the demands imposed on practitioners via cross examination demand that best practice incorporate triangulated assessment utilising both actuarial and clinical approaches to assessment. This article outlines a triangulated assessment and reporting strategy and its application to a case study.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estonian child protection workers' assessment perspectives: The need for competence and confidence
    Toros, Karmen
    LaSala, Michael C.
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK, 2018, 61 (01) : 93 - 105
  • [32] Child protection assessment in humanitarian emergencies: Case studies from Georgia, Gaza, Haiti and Yemen
    Ager, Alastair
    Blake, Courtney
    Stark, Lindsay
    Daniel, Tsufit
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2011, 35 (12) : 1045 - 1052
  • [33] Hazard, and risk modelling of glacial lakes in the Sikkim Himalaya: Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches for hazard assessment
    Gaikwad, Deepali
    Tiwari, Reet Kamal
    Kumar, Mahesh
    Guha, Supratim
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2025, 471
  • [34] DFG-Projekt: Risikoeinschätzung und Fallprozessierung in Frühen Hilfen und KinderschutzDFG project: risk assessment and case processing in early prevention and child protection
    Helga Kelle
    Amanda Edler
    Soziale Passagen, 2021, 13 (2) : 459 - 464
  • [35] Whose safety? Flexible risk assessment boundaries balance nurse safety with patient care
    O'Keeffe, Valerie J.
    Tuckey, Michelle R.
    Naweed, Anjum
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2015, 76 : 111 - 120
  • [36] Child Protection Investigations in Out-of-Home Care: Perpetrators, Victims, and Contexts
    Font, Sarah A.
    CHILD MALTREATMENT, 2015, 20 (04) : 251 - 257
  • [38] Assessment of port environmental protection in Taiwan
    Tseng, Po-Hsing
    Ng, ManWo
    MARITIME BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 6 (02) : 188 - 203
  • [39] Facilitating organisational decision making: a change risk assessment model case study
    Apostolopoulos, Charalampos
    Halikias, George
    Maroukian, Krikor
    Tsaramirsis, Georgios
    JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2016, 11 (02) : 694 - 721
  • [40] The Case for a Bayesian Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment:: Overview and Future Directions
    Costa, Maria J.
    He, Weili
    Jemiai, Yannis
    Zhao, Yueqin
    Di Casoli, Carl
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2017, 51 (05) : 568 - 574