Risk assessment in care and protection: The case for actuarial approaches

被引:0
作者
Lennings, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Behav & Community Hlth Sci, POB 170, Sydney, NSW 2141, Australia
关键词
developmental psychology; child protection; psychological assessment; actuarial approaches; decision making;
D O I
10.5172/jamh.4.1.27
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The assessment of abuse is a highly emotionally charged activity. The requirement to provide an accountable and transparent assessment process requires the development of actuarial devices and clearly enunciated decision rules. Risk assessment requires the application of ecologically valid, evidence-based approaches. Such approaches, commonly transcribed into actuarial systems, are usually incorporated into a clinical reasoning approach. Whilst academic debate tends to highlight actuarial approaches as superior to approaches based on clinical experience, both common sense and the demands imposed on practitioners via cross examination demand that best practice incorporate triangulated assessment utilising both actuarial and clinical approaches to assessment. This article outlines a triangulated assessment and reporting strategy and its application to a case study.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PRESCRIPTIVE APPROACHES TO COMMUNICATING THE RISK OF VIOLENCE IN ACTUARIAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Scurich, Nicholas
    John, Richard S.
    PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2012, 18 (01) : 50 - 78
  • [2] Actuarial risk assessment in child protective services: Construction methodology and performance criteria
    Coohey, Carol
    Johnson, Kristen
    Renner, Lynette M.
    Easton, Scott D.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2013, 35 (01) : 151 - 161
  • [3] Measuring the equity of risk assessment instruments used in child protection
    Jenkins, Brian Q.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2021, 131
  • [4] Systematic approaches to assessment in child protection investigations: A literature review
    Vis, Svein Arild
    Lauritzen, Camilla
    Fossum, Sturla
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK, 2021, 64 (03) : 325 - 340
  • [5] The evidence base for risk assessment tools used in US child protection investigations: A systematic scoping review
    McNellan, Claire R.
    Gibbs, Daniel J.
    Knobel, Ann S.
    -Hornstein, Emily Putnam
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2022, 134
  • [6] Natural springs protection and probabilistic risk assessment under uncertain conditions
    Janetti, Emanuela Bianchi
    Riva, Monica
    Guadagnini, Alberto
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 751
  • [7] Risk, Uncertainty and Public Protection: Assessment of Young People Who Offend
    Baker, Kerry
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2008, 38 (08) : 1463 - 1480
  • [8] THE EMPIRICAL CASE FOR PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS
    Desmarais, Sarah L.
    Monahan, John
    Austin, James
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2022, 49 (06) : 807 - 816
  • [9] New Approaches to Project Risk Assessment Utilizing the Monte Carlo Method
    Senova, Andrea
    Tobisova, Alica
    Rozenberg, Robert
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [10] The Effect of Framing Actuarial Risk Probabilities on Involuntary Civil Commitment Decisions
    Scurich, Nicholas
    John, Richard S.
    LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 35 (02) : 83 - 91