The Effect of Government Subsidy on Non-Technological Innovation and Firm Performance in the Service Sector: Evidence from Germany

被引:19
作者
Basit, Shoaib Abdul [1 ]
Kuhn, Thomas [1 ]
Ahmed, Mumtaz [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Chemnitz, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Chemnitz, Germany
[2] COMSATS Inst Informat Technol, Dept Management Sci, Islamabad, Pakistan
来源
BUSINESS SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL | 2018年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
marketing and organizational innovation; firm performance; subsidy; propensity score matching; kernel matching; nearest neighbor matching; radius matching;
D O I
10.2478/bsrj-2018-0010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: To enhance the innovation activities at the firm level, government subsidies plays an important role. Objectives: The objective of the study is to explore whether firms in service sector that receive government subsidies engage more in marketing and organizational innovation activities than their counterparts. Second, focusing on the subsidized firms in the service sector, the impact of innovations (marketing as well as organizational) on firm performance-measured as the probability of submitted copyright applications by firms, has been analyzed. Methods/Approach: The propensity score matching approach and probit model have been used to analyze the innovation activities of subsidized and non-subsidized firms. The empirical analysis is based on the micro level data from Mannheim Innovation Panel, covering the Community Innovation Survey of 2011. Results: Empirical results show that public subsidy has a significant positive effect on marketing and organizational innovation. In addition, within the firms that have received government subsidy, the impact of only marketing innovation is found to be significant on firm performance. Conclusions: These findings employ that subsidized firms are more likely to perform better than their counterparts. Furthermore, public subsidy programs increase the probability of applying for a copyright in small and medium firms.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 137
页数:20
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   IMPACT OF PUBLIC FUNDING ON A FIRM'S INNOVATION PERFORMANCE. ANALYSIS OF INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL MODERATING FACTORS [J].
Albors-Garrigos, Jose ;
Rodriguez Barrera, Rosa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 15 (06) :1297-1322
[2]   The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany [J].
Almus, M ;
Czarnitzki, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2003, 21 (02) :226-236
[3]   Firm characteristics and the cyclicality of R&D investments [J].
Arvanitis, Spyros ;
Woerter, Martin .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2014, 23 (05) :1141-1169
[4]   The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry [J].
Atalay, Murat ;
Anafarta, Nilgun ;
Sarvan, Fulya .
SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEADERSHIP, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT (2012), 2013, 75 :226-235
[5]   Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003 [J].
Becheikh, N ;
Landry, R ;
Amara, N .
TECHNOVATION, 2006, 26 (5-6) :644-664
[6]   R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms - evidence for the German manufacturing industry [J].
Becker, W ;
Dietz, J .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (02) :209-223
[7]   Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative? [J].
Berube, Charles ;
Mohnen, Pierre .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2009, 42 (01) :206-225
[8]  
Beugelsdijk S., 2002, J MANAG GOV, V6, P169, DOI [10.1023/A:1015775321949, DOI 10.1023/A:1015775321949]
[9]  
Bozic L, 2016, MARK-TRZ, V28, P7
[10]   When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data [J].
Branstetter, LG ;
Sakakibara, M .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (01) :143-159