WORLDWIDE SURVEY OF ASSISTED VAGINAL DELIVERY

被引：26

作者：

HILLIER, CEM ^{[1
]}

JOHANSON, RB ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] KEELE UNIV,N STAFFORDSHIRE HOSP,ACAD DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,STOKE ON TRENT ST4 6QG,STAFFS,ENGLAND

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS | 1994年 / 47卷 / 02期

关键词：

ASSISTED DELIVERY; FORCEPS; VENTOUSE; VACUUM EXTRACTION; WORLDWIDE SURVEY;

D O I：

10.1016/0020-7292(94)90349-2

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

Objectives: To ascertain which instruments are most commonly used for assisted vaginal delivery. Methods: A postal survey in which 1411 questionnaires were sent to major obstetric centers worldwide. Results: Over 60% (305/508) of the respondents indicated willingness to participate in a multicenter randomized controlled trial between the two instruments. Conclusions: The forceps remained popular in most of the 'English-speaking' countries, as well as in Eastern Europe and South America. The ventouse was most popular in Africa, Asia and Northern Europe.

引用

页码：109 / 114

页数：6

共 10 条

[1] [Anonymous], 1984, LANCET, V1, P144
[2] DIFFERENCES IN THE REPORTED FREQUENCIES OF SOME OBSTETRICAL INTERVENTIONS IN EUROPE
BERGSJO, P
SCHMIDT, E
PUSCH, D
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1983, 90 (07): : 628 - 632
[3] THE OBSTETRIC VACUUM EXTRACTOR IS THE INSTRUMENT OF 1ST CHOICE FOR OPERATIVE VAGINAL DELIVERY
CHALMERS, JA
CHALMERS, I
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (05): : 505 - 506
[4] A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY COMPARING DELIVERY WITH METAL AND SILICONE-RUBBER VACUUM EXTRACTOR CUPS
CHENOY, R
JOHANSON, R
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1992, 99 (05): : 360 - 363
[5] THE OBSTETRIC FORCEPS - ARE WE USING THE APPROPRIATE TOOLS
HIBBARD, BM
MCKENNA, DM
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 97 (05): : 374 - 380
[6] JOHANSON R, 1992, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V100, P524
[7] JOHANSON RB, 1994, PREGNANCY CHILDBIRTH
[8] A NEW DIVERGENT OUTLET FORCEPS
LAUFE, LE
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1968, 101 (04) : 509 - &
[9] INTERNATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN THE USE OF OBSTETRIC INTERVENTIONS
NOTZON, FC
[J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (24): : 3286 - 3291
[10] Stephenson P, 1992, INT DIFFERENCES USE, P112

← 1 →