Analysis of Risk Factors for Lymph Nodal Involvement in Early Stages of Rectal Cancer: When Can Local Excision Be Considered an Appropriate Treatment? Systematic Review andMeta-Analysis of the Literature

被引:26
作者
Carrara, Alessandro [1 ]
Mangiola, Daniela [2 ]
Pertile, Riccardo [3 ]
Ricci, Alberta [4 ]
Motter, Michele [1 ]
Ghezzi, Gianmarco [1 ]
Zappala, Orazio [1 ]
Ciaghi, Gianni [1 ]
Tirone, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Santa Chiara Hosp, Div Gen Surg 1, I-38122 Trento, Italy
[2] Policlin GB Rossi, Div Med Oncol & Palliat Med, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[3] APSS, Dept Hlth, I-38122 Trento, Italy
[4] Policlin GB Rossi, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, I-37134 Verona, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2012/438450
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Over the past ten years oncological outcomes achieved by local excision techniques (LETs) as the sole treatment for early stages of rectal cancer (ESRC) have been often disappointing. The reasons for these poor results lie mostly in the high risk of the disease's diffusion to local-regional lymph nodes even in ESRC. Aims. This study aims to find the correct indications for LET in ESRC taking into consideration clinical-pathological features of tumours thatmay reduce the risk of lymph node metastasis to zero. Methods. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of casistics of ESRC treated with total mesorectal excision with the aim of identifying risk factors for nodal involvement. Results. The risk of lymph node metastasis is higher in G >= 2 and T >= 2 tumours with lymphatic and/or vascular invasion. Other features which have not yet been sufficiently investigated include female gender, TSM stage > 1, presence of tumour budding and/or perineural invasion. Conclusions. Results comparable to radical surgery can be achieved by LET only in patients with T-1 N-0 G(1) tumours with low-risk histological features, whereas deeper or more aggressive tumours should be addressed by radical surgery (RS).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum - Transanal excision or radical surgery? [J].
Bentrem, DJ ;
Okabe, S ;
Wong, WD ;
Guillem, JG ;
Weiser, MR ;
Temple, LK ;
Ben-Porat, LS ;
Minsky, BD ;
Cohen, AM ;
Paty, PB .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 242 (04) :472-479
[2]   All patients with small intramural rectal cancers are at risk for lymph node metastasis [J].
Blumberg, D ;
Paty, PB ;
Guillem, JG ;
Picon, AI ;
Minsky, BD ;
Wong, WD ;
Cohen, AM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1999, 42 (07) :881-885
[3]   Local therapy for rectal cancer: Still controversial? [J].
Bretagnol, F. ;
Rullier, E. ;
George, B. ;
Warren, B. F. ;
Mortensen, N. J. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (04) :523-533
[4]  
BRODSKY JT, 1992, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V69, P322, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19920115)69:2<322::AID-CNCR2820690208>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-B
[6]   Could lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy provide oncological providence for local resectional techniques for colon cancer? A review of the literature [J].
Cahill R.A. ;
Leroy J. ;
Marescaux J. .
BMC Surgery, 8 (1)
[7]   Long-term follow-up of patients with rectal cancer managed by local excision with and without adjuvant irradiation [J].
Chakravarti, A ;
Compton, CC ;
Shellito, PC ;
Wood, WC ;
Landry, J ;
Machuta, SR ;
Kaufman, D ;
Ancukiewicz, M ;
Willett, CG .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (01) :49-54
[8]   Prognostic factors affecting survival and recurrence of patients with pT1 and pT2 colorectal cancer [J].
Chok, Kenneth S. H. ;
Law, Wai Lun .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (07) :1485-1490
[9]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[10]   Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer [J].
Endreseth, BH ;
Myrvold, HE ;
Romundstad, P ;
Hestvik, UE ;
Bjerkeset, T ;
Wibe, A .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (07) :1380-1388