Cisplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer: A Retrospective Review

被引:15
作者
Peddi, Prakash [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Runhua [1 ,2 ]
Nair, Binu [1 ,2 ]
Ampil, Fred [1 ,2 ]
Mills, Glenn M. [1 ,2 ]
Jafri, Syed H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ Hlth, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Shreveport, LA 71103 USA
[2] Feist Weiller Canc Ctr, Shreveport, LA USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Div Oncol, Dept Internal Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 9卷
关键词
head and neck cancer; cetuximab; cisplatin; radiation therapy; overall survival;
D O I
10.4137/CMO.S18682
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Efficacy of cisplatin versus cetuximab with radiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) was evaluated. A total of 96 patients with newly diagnosed LAHNC treated at our institution between 2006 and 2011 with concurrent radiation and cisplatin (group A, n = 45), cetuximab (group B, n = 24), or started with cisplatin but switched to cetuximab because of toxicity (group C, n = 27) were reviewed. Chi-square test, analysis of variance, and log-rank test were used for analysis. The three groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for median age, T stage, albumin levels, hemoglobin levels, performance status, and comorbidities. A complete response (CR) was seen in 77%, 17%, and 67% of patients (P < 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between groups A and C. The median OS for groups A and C was not reached (> 65 months), even though it was significantly longer than median OS for group B (11.6 months; P <= 0.001). The 2-year OS in groups A and C is significantly higher than that in group B (70% for groups A and C, 22% for group B). There is no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between groups A and C. The median PFS for these groups was not reached (>62 months), and is significantly longer than that for group B (4.3 months; P <= 0.001). The 2-year PFS of group A (67%) and group C (76%) was significantly longer than that of group B (20%). Cisplatin with radiation appears to be more efficacious even in suboptimal dosing than cetuximab with radiation in LAHNC but the two groups were not well matched.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CONCURRENT CISPLATIN AND RADIATION VERSUS CETUXIMAB AND RADIATION FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER
    Koutcher, Lawrence
    Sherman, Eric
    Fury, Matthew
    Wolden, Suzanne
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Mo, Qianxing
    Stewart, Laschelle
    Schupak, Karen
    Gelblum, Daphna
    Wong, Richard
    Kraus, Dennis
    Shah, Jatin
    Zelefsky, Michael
    Pfister, David
    Lee, Nancy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (04): : 915 - 922
  • [2] Toxicity of cetuximab versus cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC)
    Walsh, Lorraine
    Gillham, Charles
    Dunne, Mary
    Fraser, Ian
    Hollywood, Donal
    Armstrong, John
    Thirion, Pierre
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 (01) : 38 - 41
  • [3] A Phase I/II Study of Nab-Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Cetuximab With Concurrent Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck
    Chun, Stephen G.
    Hughes, Randall
    Sumer, Baran D.
    Myers, Larry L.
    Truelson, John M.
    Khan, Saad A.
    Ma, Tsung-Wei
    Xie, Yang
    Yordy, John S.
    Cooley, Susan
    Wu, Jean
    Choy, Hak
    Nedzi, Lucien A.
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2017, 35 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [4] Cisplatin Versus Cetuximab With Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
    Husain, Zain A.
    Burtness, Barbara A.
    Decker, Roy H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (05) : 396 - +
  • [5] Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer in patients with cisplatin-ineligible renal dysfunction: A retrospective study
    Imai, Chiaki
    Saeki, Hiromi
    Yamamoto, Kohei
    Ichikawa, Ayano
    Arai, Makoto
    Tawada, Akinobu
    Suzuki, Takaaki
    Takiguchi, Yuichi
    Hanazawa, Toyoyuki
    Ishii, Itsuko
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 23 (05)
  • [6] RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY WITH CETUXIMAB, CISPLATIN, AND AMIFOSTINE FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK CANCER: A FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Koukourakis, Michael I.
    Tsoutsou, Pelagia G.
    Karpouzis, Antonios
    Tsiarkatsi, Maria
    Karapantzos, Ilias
    Daniilidis, Vassilios
    Kouskoukis, Constantinos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (01): : 9 - 15
  • [7] Concurrent cisplatin or cetuximab with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma A meta-analysis
    Tang, Wen-Hua
    Sun, Wei
    Long, Guo-Xian
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (36)
  • [8] Primary chemoradiation with cisplatin versus cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Il Seok Daniel Jeong
    Huan Mo
    Anthony Nguyen
    Esther G. Chong
    Hsin Hsiang Clarence Tsai
    Justin Moyers
    Matthew Kim
    Curtis Lacy
    Vivek Shah
    Eric Lau
    Yi Xu
    Huynh Cao
    Experimental Hematology & Oncology, 9
  • [9] Primary chemoradiation with cisplatin versus cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Jeong, Il Seok Daniel
    Mo, Huan
    Nguyen, Anthony
    Chong, Esther G.
    Tsai, Hsin Hsiang Clarence
    Moyers, Justin
    Kim, Matthew
    Lacy, Curtis
    Shah, Vivek
    Lau, Eric
    Xu, Yi
    Cao, Huynh
    EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [10] Cisplatin versus Cetuximab Given Concurrently with Definitive Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Ley, Jessica
    Mehan, Paul
    Wildes, Tanya M.
    Thorstad, Wade
    Gay, Hiram A.
    Michel, Loren
    Nussenbaum, Brian
    Trinkaus, Kathryn
    Adkins, Douglas
    ONCOLOGY, 2013, 85 (05) : 290 - 296