共 91 条
A pragmatic approach to evaluating new techniques in regional anesthesia and acute pain medicine
被引:19
作者:
Mudumbai, Seshadri C.
[1
,2
]
Auyong, David B.
[3
]
Memtsoudis, Stavros G.
[4
,5
,6
]
Mariano, Edward R.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Anesthesiol & Perioperat Care Serv, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[4] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care & Pain Management, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY USA
[6] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Healthcare Policy & Res, New York, NY USA
关键词:
access;
disparities;
efficiency;
grading system;
implementation;
novel techniques;
outcomes;
regional anesthesia;
D O I:
10.2217/pmt-2018-0017
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Anesthesiologists set up regional anesthesia and acute pain medicine programs in order to improve the patient outcomes and experience. Given the increasing frequency and volume of newly described techniques, applying a pragmatic framework can guide clinicians on how to critically review and consider implementing the new techniques into clinical practice. A proposed framework should consider how a technique: increases access; enhances efficiency; decreases disparities and improves outcomes. Quantifying the relative contribution of these four factors using a point system, which will be specific to each practice, can generate an overall scorecard to help clinicians make decisions on whether or not to incorporate a new technique into clinical practice or replace an incumbent technique within a clinical pathway. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 485
页数:11
相关论文