Arterial and end-tidal carbon dioxide difference in pediatric intensive care

被引:18
作者
Goonasekera, Chulananda Dias [1 ]
Goodwin, Alison [1 ]
Wang, Yanzhong [2 ]
Goodman, James [3 ]
Deep, Akash [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, Paediat Intens Care Unit, Womens & Childrens Div, London, England
[2] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Anesthet, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Div Hlth & Social Care Res, London, England
关键词
Capnography; carbon dioxide partial pressure; critical care; pediatrics;
D O I
10.4103/0972-5229.144011
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) is considered the gold standard for scrupulous monitoring in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), but it is invasive, laborious, expensive, and intermittent. The study aims to explore when we can use endtidal carbon dioxide tension (P-ET CO2) as a reliable, continuous, and noninvasive monitor of arterial CO2 Materials and Methods: Concurrent P-ET CO2, fraction of inspired oxygen, PaCO2, and arterial oxygen tension values of clinically stable children on mechanical ventilation were recorded. Children with extra-pulmonary ventriculoatrial shunts were excluded. The P-ET CO2 and PaCO2 difference and its variability and reproducibility were studied. Results: A total of 624 concurrent readings were obtained from 105 children (mean age [SD] 5.53 [5.43] years) requiring invasive bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation in the PICU. All had continuous PETCO2 monitoring and an arterial line for blood gas measurement. The mean (SD) number of concurrent readings obtained from each child, 4-6 h apart was 6.0 (4.05). The PETCO2 values were higher than PaCO2 in 142 observations (22.7%). The PaCO2-PETCO2 difference was individual admission specific (ANOVA, P < 0.001). The PaCO2-PETCO2 difference correlated positively with the alveolar-arterial oxygen tension [P(A-a)O-2] difference (rho = 0.381 P < 0.0001). There was a fixed bias between the PETCO2 and PaCO2 measuring methods, difference +0.66 KPa (95% confidence interval: +0.57 to +0.76). Conclusions: The PaCO2-PETCO2 difference was individual specific. It was not affected by the primary disorder leading to the ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 715
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]  
Carlo W A, 1999, Pediatr Rev, V20, pe117
[3]   Relationship between end-tidal and arterial carbon dioxide with laryngeal mask airways and endotracheal tubes in children [J].
Chhibber, AK ;
Kolano, JW ;
Roberts, WA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (02) :247-250
[4]   A REVIEW OF PEDIATRIC CAPNOGRAPHY [J].
Eipe, Naveen ;
Doherty, Dermot R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2010, 24 (04) :261-268
[5]   DEADSPACE AND THE SINGLE BREATH TEST FOR CARBON-DIOXIDE DURING ANESTHESIA AND ARTIFICIAL-VENTILATION [J].
FLETCHER, R ;
JONSON, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 56 (02) :109-119
[6]   DIFFERENCE BETWEEN END-TIDAL AND ARTERIAL PCO2 IN EXERCISE [J].
JONES, NL ;
ROBERTSON, DG ;
KANE, JW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 47 (05) :954-960
[8]  
Khan Fauzia Anis, 2007, J Pak Med Assoc, V57, P446
[9]  
McArthur Charles D, 2003, Respir Care, V48, P534
[10]  
McSwain SD, 2010, RESP CARE, V55, P288