SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY-BASED SCENARIOS FOR UNCERTAIN INPUT PARAMETERS - STRATOSPHERIC OZONE DEPLETION

被引:2
作者
HAMMITT, JK
机构
[1] The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 90406-2138
关键词
modeling; ozone depletion; scenarios; Sensitivity analysis; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb01024.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Risk analysis often depends on complex, computer‐based models to describe links between policies (e.g., required emission‐control equipment) and consequences (e.g., probabilities of adverse health effects). Appropriate specification of many model aspects is uncertain, including details of the model structure; transport, reaction‐rate, and other parameters; and application‐specific inputs such as pollutant‐release rates. Because these uncertainties preclude calculation of the precise consequences of a policy, it is important to characterize the plausible range of effects. In principle, a probability distribution function for the effects can be constructed using Monte Carlo analysis, but the combinatorics of multiple uncertainties and the often high cost of model runs quickly exhaust available resources. This paper presents and applies a method to choose sets of input conditions (scenarios) that efficiently represent knowledge about the joint probability distribution of inputs. A simple score function approximately relating inputs to a policy‐relevant output—in this case, globally averaged stratospheric ozone depletion—is developed. The probability density function for the score‐function value is analytically derived from a subjective joint probability density for the inputs. Scenarios are defined by selected quantiles of the score function. Using this method, scenarios can be systematically selected in terms of the approximate probability distribution function for the output of concern, and probability intervals for the joint effect of the inputs can be readily constructed. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 102
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   ASSESSING THE ADEQUACY OF NATURAL-SCIENCE INFORMATION - A BAYESIAN-APPROACH [J].
ADAMS, RM ;
CROCKER, TD ;
KATZ, RW .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1984, 66 (04) :568-575
[2]  
Barr Avron, 1982, HDB ARTIFICIAL INTEL, V2
[4]  
CAMM F, 1986, N2440EPA RAND CORP
[5]  
Cox DC, 1981, RISK ANAL, V1, P251, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1539-6924.1981.TB01425.X
[6]   FUTURE GLOBAL WARMING FROM ATMOSPHERIC TRACE GASES [J].
DICKINSON, RE ;
CICERONE, RJ .
NATURE, 1986, 319 (6049) :109-115
[7]   AN EXAMINATION OF RESPONSE-SURFACE METHODOLOGIES FOR UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS IN ASSESSMENT MODELS [J].
DOWNING, DJ ;
GARDNER, RH ;
HOFFMAN, FO .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1985, 27 (02) :151-163
[8]  
Draper D, 1987, N2683RC RAND CORP
[9]  
EDMONDS JA, 1984, TR013 US DEP EN CARB
[10]   THE PRODUCTION AND RELEASE TO THE ATMOSPHERE OF CCL3F AND CCL2F2 (CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS CFC-11 AND CFC-12) [J].
GAMLEN, PH ;
LANE, BC ;
MIDGLEY, PM ;
STEED, JM .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1986, 20 (06) :1077-1085