Accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) compared to random biopsies during endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus

被引:23
作者
Shah, Tilak [1 ,2 ]
Lippman, Robert [1 ]
Kohli, Divyanshoo [3 ]
Mutha, Pritesh [1 ,2 ]
Solomon, Sanjeev [4 ]
Zfass, Alvin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Med Ctr, Med Gastroenterol, Richmond, VA USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Ctr Med Gastroenterol, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Mayo Clin Arizona, Gastroenterol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[4] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Gastroenterol, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-0043-124868
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background For surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE), the current standard of random 4-quadrant biopsies misses 10-50% of esophageal neoplasms, and does not permit real-time decision-making. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) permits real-time in vivo histologic assessment of esophageal mucosa during upper endoscopy. Prospective studies comparing the accuracy of pCLE to 4-quadrant biopsies in routine clinical practice are lacking. Methods Consecutive patients with BE underwent high definition white light and narrow-band imaging followed by pCLE and targeted biopsy or mucosal resection. Four-quadrant biopsies were obtained during the same session. Baseline variables, real-time pCLE interpretation, and histology results were prospectively recorded. Blinded expert review of pCLE sequences and histology specimens was performed. A sample size of 64 patients was calculated a priori based on 3% estimated prevalence of high grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer. Results In total, 66 patients were included in the study. The prevalence of HGD or cancer was 4.55%. Both real-time and blinded pCLE correctly identified all cases of cancer. For the primary outcome, real-time pCLE was 98% specific but only 67% sensitive for HGD/cancer compared to non-blinded pathologist interpretation. For HGD and cancer, inter-observer agreement was substantial between real-time and blinded endomicroscopists (kappa=0.6). pCLE identified dysplasia in 75% of cases where both blinded and unblinded pathology interpretation was low grade dysplasia. Conclusions pCLE demonstrates high specificity for detecting dysplasia and cancer, but lower sensitivity may limit its utility in routine BE surveillance. pCLE may have a role in confirming LGD in real-time before eradication therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:E414 / E420
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Adherence to Biopsy Guidelines for Barrett's Esophagus Surveillance in the Community Setting in the United States [J].
Abrams, Julian A. ;
Kapel, Robert C. ;
Lindberg, Guy M. ;
Saboorian, Mohammad H. ;
Genta, Robert M. ;
Neugut, Alfred I. ;
Lightdale, Charles J. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 7 (07) :736-742
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ASGS REV CONFOCAL LA
[3]   Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy compared with standard four-quadrant biopsy for evaluation of neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus [J].
Bajbouj, M. ;
Vieth, M. ;
Roesch, T. ;
Miehlke, S. ;
Becker, V. ;
Anders, M. ;
Pohl, H. ;
Madisch, A. ;
Schuster, T. ;
Schmid, R. M. ;
Meining, A. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 42 (06) :435-440
[4]   In vivo endomicroscopy improves detection of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: a multicenter international randomized controlled trial (with video) [J].
Canto, Marcia Irene ;
Anandasabapathy, Sharmila ;
Brugge, William ;
Falk, Gary W. ;
Dunbar, Kerry B. ;
Zhang, Zhe ;
Woods, Kevin ;
Almario, Jose Antonio ;
Schell, Ursula ;
Goldblum, John ;
Maitra, Anirban ;
Montgomery, Elizabeth ;
Kiesslich, Ralf .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 79 (02) :211-221
[5]   Confocal laser endomicroscopy [J].
Chauhan, Shailendra S. ;
Abu Dayyeh, Barham K. ;
Bhat, Yasser M. ;
Gottlieb, Klaus T. ;
Hwang, Joo Ha ;
Komanduri, Sri ;
Konda, Vani ;
Lo, Simon K. ;
Manfredi, Michael A. ;
Maple, John T. ;
Murad, Faris M. ;
Siddiqui, Uzma D. ;
Banerjee, Subhas ;
Wallace, Michael B. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 80 (06) :928-938
[6]   Autofluorescence-Directed Confocal Endomicroscopy in Combination With a Three-Biomarker Panel Can Inform Management Decisions in Barrett's Esophagus [J].
di Pietro, Massimiliano ;
Bird-Lieberman, Elizabeth L. ;
Liu, Xinxue ;
Nuckcheddy-Grant, Tara ;
Bertani, Helga ;
O'Donovan, Maria ;
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 (11) :1549-1558
[7]   Jumbo biopsy forceps protocol still misses unsuspected cancer in Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia [J].
Falk, GW ;
Rice, TW ;
Goldblum, JR ;
Richter, JE .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (02) :170-176
[8]   Novel Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Criteria and Interobserver Agreement for the Detection of Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus [J].
Gaddam, Srinivas ;
Mathur, Sharad C. ;
Singh, Mandeep ;
Arora, Jaya ;
Wani, Sachin B. ;
Gupta, Neil ;
Overhiser, Andrew ;
Rastogi, Amit ;
Singh, Vikas ;
Desai, Neel ;
Hall, Sandra B. ;
Bansal, Ajay ;
Sharma, Prateek .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 (11) :1961-1969
[9]   Detection and classification of the mucosal and vascular patterns (mucosal morphology) in Barrett's esophagus by using narrow band imaging [J].
Kara, Mohammed A. ;
Ennahachi, Mohamed ;
Fockens, Paul ;
ten Kate, Fiebo J. W. ;
Bergman, Jacques J. G. H. M. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 64 (02) :155-166
[10]   The Seattle Protocol Does Not More Reliably Predict the Detection of Cancer at the Time of Esophagectomy Than a Less Intensive Surveillance Protocol [J].
Kariv, Revital ;
Plesec, Thomas P. ;
Goldblum, John R. ;
Bronner, Mary ;
Oldenburgh, Mary ;
Rice, Thomas W. ;
Falk, Gary W. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 7 (06) :653-658