On the Relationship of Multiple Intelligences With Listening Proficiency and Attitudes Among Iranian TEFL University Students

被引:0
作者
Naeini, Ma'ssoumeh Bemani [1 ]
Pandian, Ambigapathy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, TESL, Gelugor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Languages Literacies & Translat, Gelugor, Malaysia
来源
TESL CANADA JOURNAL | 2010年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.18806/tesl.v28i1.1062
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Gardner's (1983) Multiple Intelligences Theory (MIT) has been found to have profound implications in teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL) in that it provides a way for teachers to recognize learners' individual cognitive and affective differences by providing favorable motivational conditions for learning. However, little investigation has focused on the domains of cognition and affect in a single study. Therefore, this study investigates two facets: the relationship of Multiple Intelligences (MIs) with listening among Iranian TEFL university students and the possible relationship between the type of intelligence the students fall into and their attitudes toward learning English. In this study, McKenzie's (1999) MI Inventory was used to identify 60 participants' preferred intelligences. The participants comprised an intact group randomly assigned to the experiment. A Likert-type questionnaire was employed to elicit data about participants' levels of personality traits that accounted for their attitudes to language-learning. Also, the participants' listening comprehension proficiency was measured using the listening section of a retired TOEFL test. Data analysis using Pearson correlation revealed no significant relationship between the score of listening and any of the MIs. Similarly, the results indicated no significant difference between MIs and attitudes.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 114
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Multiple intelligences and language learning strategies: Investigating possible relations [J].
Akbari, Ramin ;
Hosseini, Kobra .
SYSTEM, 2008, 36 (02) :141-155
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, UNDERSTANDING LEARNI
[3]  
Armstrong T., 2000, MULTIPLE INTELLIGENC
[4]  
Arnold J., 2004, INT J ENGL STUD, V4, P119
[5]  
Brown H.D., 2000, PRINCIPLES LANGUAGE, VVolume 4
[6]   AFFECTIVE VARIABLES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION [J].
BROWN, HD .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 1973, 23 (02) :231-244
[7]  
Campbell L., 1997, LEADERSHIP, V55
[8]  
Carter R., 2001, CAMBRIDGE GUIDE TEAC
[9]   LEARNING-STRATEGIES IN FOREIGN-LANGUAGE INSTRUCTION [J].
CHAMOT, AU ;
KUPPER, L .
FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 1989, 22 (01) :13-24
[10]  
Chastain K., 1988, DEV 2 LANGUAGE SKILL, V3rd