INTRAVENOUS AMIODARONE VS PROPAFENONE FOR ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION AND FLUTTER AFTER CARDIAC OPERATION

被引:35
作者
DIBIASI, P
SCROFANI, R
PAJE, A
CAPPIELLO, E
MANGINI, A
SANTOLI, C
机构
[1] Divisione dl Chirurgia Toracla e Cardiovascolare, Osp. L Sacco, Milano, 1-20157
[2] Divisione dl Chirurgia Toracla e Cardiovascolare, Osp. L Sacco, Milano, 1-20157
关键词
CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING; ARRHYTHMIAS; AMIODARONE; PROPAFENONE; HEART SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/S1010-7940(05)80011-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The safety and efficacy of amiodarone and propafenone in converting atrial fibrillation or flutter after cardiac surgery were compared in a randomized double-blind trial. Eighty-four patients with sustained atrial tachyarrhythmias of more than 30 min' duration, stable hemodynamic status and neither preoperative atrial arrhythmias nor treatment with other antiarrhythmis drugs, were randomized to receive amiodarone (46 patients: 5 mg/kg over 15 min and then 15 mg/kg over the subsequent 24 h for non-converting) or propafenone (38 patients: 2 mg/kg over 15 in and then 10 mg/kg over the subsequent 24 h for non-converting). Nine of the 46 patients (19.5 %) receiving amiodarone converted to sinus rhythm within 1 h following bolus injection compared with 17 of 38 patients (44.7 %) treated with propafenone (P < 0.05). Within the 24 h study, 38 of 46 patients (82.6 %) given amiodarone and 26 of 38 patients (68.4 %) given propafenone were converted to sinus rhythm (P=NS). A significantly progressive reduction in ventricular response, already evident at 10th min from the start of treatment, was achieved in both groups of patients, Side effects occurred in six patients given propafenone (15.7 %) and in five given amiodarone (10.8 %) (P=NS), The two drugs were equally effective in converting postoperative atrial fibrillation and/or flutter after 24 h although propafenone was superior within the first hour.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 591
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Alessie M.A., Bonke F., Atrial arrhythmias, basic concepts, Cardiac Arrhythmias, Their Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Management, pp. 186-207, (1987)
[2]  
Alessie M.A., Bonke F., Schopman F., Circus movement in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of tachycardia, Circ Res, 33, pp. 54-62, (1973)
[3]  
Campbell T.J., Gavaghan T.P., Morgan J.J., Intravenous sotalol for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and flutter after cardiopulmonary bypass: Comparison with disopyramide and digoxin in a randomized trial, Br Heart J, 54, pp. 86-90, (1985)
[4]  
Caretta Q., Mercanti C.A., De Nardo D., Chiarotti F., Scibilia G., Reale A., Marino B., Ventricular conduction defects and atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Multivariate analysis of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables, Eur Heart J, 12, pp. 1107-1111, (1991)
[5]  
Cochrane A.D., Siddins M., Rosenfeldt F.L., Salamonsen R., Me Connaghy L., Marasco S., Davis B.B., A comparison of amiodarone and digoxin for treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias after cardiac surgery, Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg, 8, pp. 194-198, (1994)
[6]  
Connolly S.J., Mulji A.S., Hoffert D.L., Davis C., Shragge B.W., Randomized placebo-controlled trial of propafenone for treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery, J am Coll Cardiol, 10, pp. 1145-1148, (1987)
[7]  
Gavaghan T.P., Fenely M.P., Campbell T.J., Morgan T.J., Tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery: Results of disopyramide therapy, Aust NZ J Med, 15, pp. 17-32, (1985)
[8]  
Gentili C., Giordano F., Alois A., Massa E., Bianconi L., Efficacy of intravenous propafenone in acute atrial fibrillation complicating open heart surgery, Am Heart J, 123, pp. 1225-1228, (1992)
[9]  
Goy J.J., Metrailler J.C., Humair L., De Torrente A., Restoration of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation of recent onset using intravenous propafenone, Am Heart J, 122, pp. 1788-1790, (1991)
[10]  
Groves P.H., Hall R., Atrial tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery, Eur Heart J, 12, pp. 458-463, (1991)