Verification of setup errors in external beam radiation therapy using electronic portal imaging

被引:7
作者
Murthy, K. Krishna [1 ]
Al-Rahbi, Zakiya [1 ]
Sivakumar, S. S. [1 ]
Davis, C. A. [1 ]
Ravichandran, R. [1 ]
El Ghamrawy, Kamal [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Oncol Ctr, Royal Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, POB 1331, Muscat 111, Oman
关键词
Anatomy matching software; electronic portal imaging device; immobilization casts; setup error; tumor control probability;
D O I
10.4103/0971-6203.41192
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to conduct an audit on QA aspects of treatment delivery by the verification of the treatment fields position on different days to document the efficiency of immobilization methods and reproducibility of treatment. A retrospective study was carried out on 60 patients, each 20 treated for head and neck, breast, and pelvic sites; and a total of 506 images obtained by electronic portal imaging device (EPID) were analyzed. The portal images acquired using the EPID systems attached to the Varian linear accelerators were superimposed on the reference images. The anatomy matching software (Varian portal Vision. 6.0) was used, and the displacements in two dimensions and rotation were noted for each treated field to study the patient setup errors. The percentages of mean deviations more than 3 mm in lateral (X) and longitudinal (Y) directions were 17.5%, 11.25%, and 7.5% for breast, pelvis, and head and neck cases respectively. In all cases, the percentage of mean deviation with more than 5 mm error was 0.83%. The maximum average mean deviation in all the cases was 1.87. The average mean SD along X and Y directions in all the cases was less than 2.65. The results revealed that the ranges of setup errors are site specific and immobilization methods improve reproducibility. The observed variations were well within the limits. The study confirmed the accuracy and quality of treatments delivered to the patients.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 53
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Development of patient support devices for execution of clinical radiotherapy for cancer patients: A preliminary report [J].
Babu, N. K. ;
Singh, Bakshish ;
Namrata, S. ;
Mohanti, B. K. ;
Ravichandran, R. ;
Ghamrawy, K. E. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 31 (04) :255-261
[2]   Comparison of two dead and neck immobilization systems [J].
Bentel, GC ;
Marks, LB ;
Hendren, K ;
Brizel, DM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (04) :867-873
[3]   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMMOBILIZATION DURING PROSTATE IRRADIATION [J].
BENTEL, GC ;
MARKS, LB ;
SHEROUSE, GW ;
SPENCER, DP ;
ANSCHER, MS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (01) :143-148
[4]   AUTOMATIC VERIFICATION OF RADIATION-FIELD SHAPE USING DIGITAL PORTAL IMAGES [J].
BIJHOLD, J ;
GILHUIJS, KGA ;
VANHERK, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (04) :1007-1014
[5]   Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors [J].
Gilbeau, L ;
Octave-Prignot, M ;
Loncol, T ;
Renard, L ;
Scalliet, P ;
Grégoire, V .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 58 (02) :155-162
[6]   IMMOBILIZATION ERROR - SOME THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
GOITEIN, M ;
BUSSE, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1975, 117 (02) :407-412
[7]   AN EVALUATION OF SETUP UNCERTAINTIES FOR PATIENTS TREATED TO PELVIC SITES [J].
HUNT, MA ;
SCHULTHEISS, TE ;
DESOBRY, GE ;
HAKKI, M ;
HANKS, GE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (01) :227-233
[8]   Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice [J].
Hurkmans, CW ;
Remeijer, P ;
Lebesque, JV ;
Mijnheer, BJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 58 (02) :105-120
[9]  
ICRU, 1976, 24 ICRU
[10]   COMPREHENSIVE QA FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY - REPORT OF AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK-GROUP-40 [J].
KUTCHER, GJ ;
COIA, L ;
GILLIN, M ;
HANSON, WF ;
LEIBEL, S ;
MORTON, RJ ;
PALTA, JR ;
PURDY, JA ;
REINSTEIN, LE ;
SVENSSON, GK ;
WELLER, M ;
WINGFIELD, L .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (04) :581-618