Computed radiography exposure indices in mammography

被引:1
作者
Koen, Liebner [1 ]
Herbst, Charles [1 ]
Rae, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Free State, Dept Med Phys, Bloemfontein, South Africa
来源
SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2008年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.4102/sajr.v12i2.565
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background. Studies indicate that computed radiography (CR) can lead to increased radiation dose to patients. It is therefore important to relate the exposure indicators provided by CR manufacturers to the radiation dose delivered so as to assess the radiation dose delivered to patients directly from the exposure indicators. Aim. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of an Agfa CR system in order to characterise the dose indicators provided by the system. Method. The imaging plate response was characterised in terms of entrance exposure to the plate and the digital signal indicators generated by the system (SAL - scanning average level; and lgM - logarithmic median) for different beam qualities. Several exposures were performed on a mammography unit, and the digital signal, expressed in terms of SAL and lgM for each image, was correlated with the entrance exposure on a standard American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. From this correlation, a relationship between the Agfa dose indices (SAL and lgM) and the average glandular dose (AGD) in mammography could be established. An equation was derived to calculate the AGD delivered to the patient as a function of the exposure indicator, lgM, and the kV. Results. The results indicated that the measured AGD at 28 kV for a standard breast thickness during routine calibration with the ACR phantom was 1.58 mGy (lgM=1.99). This dose value lay within 1.5% of the value calculated using the derived equation for a standard Perspex thickness of 4.2 cm using the automatic exposure control (AEC) (1.56 mGy). The standard error in using this equation was calculated to be 8.3%.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 31
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Computed Radiography Image Exposure Revisited and Case Study
    Yang, Z.
    Lobick, J.
    Nagy, P.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [32] Optimization of Exposure Factors and Image Quality for Computed Radiography
    Khotle, T.
    De Vos, H.
    Herbst, C. P.
    Rae, W. I. D.
    [J]. WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 25, PT 2 - DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, 2009, 25 : 251 - 254
  • [33] DUAL-ENERGY DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY UTILIZING STIMULATED PHOSPHOR COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY
    BRETTLE, DS
    COWEN, AR
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (11) : 1989 - 2004
  • [34] Perceptions of Radiation Safety Culture Among Radiography, Computed Tomography, And Mammography Technologists
    Moore, Quentin T.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 95 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [35] Direct magnification mammography in combination with computed radiography. First clinical results
    Hundertmark, C
    Breiter, N
    Hermann, KP
    Funke, M
    Wiese, M
    vonHeyden, D
    Grabbe, E
    [J]. RADIOLOGE, 1997, 37 (08): : 597 - 603
  • [36] DETECTION OF SUBTLE MICROCALCIFICATIONS - COMPARISON OF COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY AND SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY
    HIGASHIDA, Y
    MORIBE, N
    MORITA, K
    KATSUDA, N
    HATEMURA, M
    TAKADA, T
    TAKAHASHI, M
    YAMASHITA, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (02) : 483 - 486
  • [37] Survey of patient exposure from general radiography and mammography in Japan in 2014
    Asada, Y.
    Suzuki, S.
    Minami, K.
    Shirakawa, S.
    Kobayashi, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2016, 36 (02) : N8 - N18
  • [38] Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system and computed radiography for mammography
    Brem, Rachel F.
    Hoffmeister, Jeffrey W.
    Rapelyea, Jocelyn A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 30 (04): : 459 - 459
  • [39] COMPARISON OF FULL FIELD DIGITAL (FFD) AND COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY (CR) MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEMS IN GREECE
    Kalathaki, M.
    Hourdakis, C. J.
    Economides, S.
    Tritakis, P.
    Kalyvas, N.
    Simantirakis, G.
    Manousaridis, G.
    Kaisas, I.
    Kamenopoulou, V.
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2011, 147 (1-2) : 202 - 205
  • [40] Performance evaluation of a "dual-side read" dedicated mammography computed radiography system
    Fetterly, KA
    Schueler, BA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (07) : 1843 - 1854