Computed radiography exposure indices in mammography

被引:1
作者
Koen, Liebner [1 ]
Herbst, Charles [1 ]
Rae, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Free State, Dept Med Phys, Bloemfontein, South Africa
来源
SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2008年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.4102/sajr.v12i2.565
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background. Studies indicate that computed radiography (CR) can lead to increased radiation dose to patients. It is therefore important to relate the exposure indicators provided by CR manufacturers to the radiation dose delivered so as to assess the radiation dose delivered to patients directly from the exposure indicators. Aim. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of an Agfa CR system in order to characterise the dose indicators provided by the system. Method. The imaging plate response was characterised in terms of entrance exposure to the plate and the digital signal indicators generated by the system (SAL - scanning average level; and lgM - logarithmic median) for different beam qualities. Several exposures were performed on a mammography unit, and the digital signal, expressed in terms of SAL and lgM for each image, was correlated with the entrance exposure on a standard American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. From this correlation, a relationship between the Agfa dose indices (SAL and lgM) and the average glandular dose (AGD) in mammography could be established. An equation was derived to calculate the AGD delivered to the patient as a function of the exposure indicator, lgM, and the kV. Results. The results indicated that the measured AGD at 28 kV for a standard breast thickness during routine calibration with the ACR phantom was 1.58 mGy (lgM=1.99). This dose value lay within 1.5% of the value calculated using the derived equation for a standard Perspex thickness of 4.2 cm using the automatic exposure control (AEC) (1.56 mGy). The standard error in using this equation was calculated to be 8.3%.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 31
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Digital mammography with synchrotron radiation: characterization of a novel computed radiography system
    Trivellato, S.
    Vandenbroucke, D.
    Arfelli, F.
    Bessem, M.
    Fedon, C.
    Longo, R.
    Tromba, G.
    Taibi, A.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIO-MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION AND RELATED ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES (BIOMEP 2015), 2015, 637
  • [22] A CLINICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY UTILIZING COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY
    BRETTLE, DS
    WARD, SC
    PARKIN, GJS
    COWEN, AR
    SUMSION, HJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (797) : 464 - 468
  • [23] Exposure Determination in Gamma-Ray Radiography for Mammography Applications
    Taha, Eslam M.
    Alhawsawi, Abdulsalam M.
    Mohammed, Mohammed Siddig H.
    Balamesh, Ahmed
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 47 (06) : 7583 - 7591
  • [24] A Method for Deriving Exam-Specific Target Exposure Indices (TEI) in Computed Radiography as a Function of a Reference TEI
    Hulme, K.
    Kubicki, V.
    Dong, F.
    Davros, W.
    Johnson, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [25] Exposure Determination in Gamma-Ray Radiography for Mammography Applications
    Eslam M. Taha
    Abdulsalam M. Alhawsawi
    Mohammed Siddig H. Mohammed
    Ahmed Balamesh
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2022, 47 : 7583 - 7591
  • [26] Screening Mammography Efficacy: A Comparison Between Screen-Film, Computed Radiography and Digital Mammography in Taiwan
    Elbakkoush, Abdallah Ahmed
    Atique, Suleman
    Chiang, I-Jen
    MEDINFO 2015: EHEALTH-ENABLED HEALTH, 2015, 216 : 914 - 914
  • [27] The Clinical Efficacy of the Exposure Index Value in Computed Radiography
    Butler, M.
    Lewis, M.
    Rainford, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [28] Significance of exposure data recognizer modes in computed radiography
    Huda, W
    Slone, RM
    Arreola, M
    Hoyle, BA
    Jing, ZX
    PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING: MEDICAL IMAGING 1996, 1996, 2708 : 609 - 616
  • [29] Computed radiography X-ray exposure trends
    Seibert, JA
    Shelton, DK
    Moore, EH
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 3 (04) : 313 - 318
  • [30] Optimization of Exposure Factors and Image Quality for Computed Radiography
    Khotle, T.
    De Vos, H.
    Herbst, C. P.
    Rae, W. I. D.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 25, PT 2 - DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, 2009, 25 : 251 - 254