Computed radiography exposure indices in mammography

被引:1
作者
Koen, Liebner [1 ]
Herbst, Charles [1 ]
Rae, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Free State, Dept Med Phys, Bloemfontein, South Africa
来源
SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2008年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.4102/sajr.v12i2.565
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background. Studies indicate that computed radiography (CR) can lead to increased radiation dose to patients. It is therefore important to relate the exposure indicators provided by CR manufacturers to the radiation dose delivered so as to assess the radiation dose delivered to patients directly from the exposure indicators. Aim. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of an Agfa CR system in order to characterise the dose indicators provided by the system. Method. The imaging plate response was characterised in terms of entrance exposure to the plate and the digital signal indicators generated by the system (SAL - scanning average level; and lgM - logarithmic median) for different beam qualities. Several exposures were performed on a mammography unit, and the digital signal, expressed in terms of SAL and lgM for each image, was correlated with the entrance exposure on a standard American College of Radiology (ACR) phantom. From this correlation, a relationship between the Agfa dose indices (SAL and lgM) and the average glandular dose (AGD) in mammography could be established. An equation was derived to calculate the AGD delivered to the patient as a function of the exposure indicator, lgM, and the kV. Results. The results indicated that the measured AGD at 28 kV for a standard breast thickness during routine calibration with the ACR phantom was 1.58 mGy (lgM=1.99). This dose value lay within 1.5% of the value calculated using the derived equation for a standard Perspex thickness of 4.2 cm using the automatic exposure control (AEC) (1.56 mGy). The standard error in using this equation was calculated to be 8.3%.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 31
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuji computed radiography systems for mammography
    Uzenoff, R
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1324 - 1324
  • [2] Spectrum optimization for computed radiography mammography systems
    Figl, Michael
    Homolka, Peter
    Semturs, Friedrich
    Kaar, Marcus
    Hummel, Johann
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (08): : 1034 - 1039
  • [3] Digital mammography performed with computed radiography technology
    Jouan, B
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 31 (01) : 18 - 24
  • [4] Dual compression mammography using computed radiography
    Highnam, RP
    Brady, JM
    Shepstone, BJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (820) : 373 - 374
  • [5] COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS SCREEN-FILM RADIOGRAPHY FOR MAMMOGRAPHY APPLICATIONS
    SHAW, CC
    WANG, T
    BREITENSTEIN, DS
    HERRON, JM
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 325 - 325
  • [6] Performance Characterization of Computed Radiography based Mammography Systems
    Singh, Abhinav
    Desai, Nikunj
    Valentino, Daniel J.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2010, 7622
  • [7] DUAL-SCREEN COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY TECHNIQUE FOR MAMMOGRAPHY
    SHAW, CC
    WANG, T
    BREITENSTEIN, DS
    GUR, D
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 324 - 324
  • [8] Dual compression mammography using computed radiography - Reply
    Brettle, D
    Thompson, J
    Parkin, G
    Cowen, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (820) : 374 - 374
  • [9] Improvement in image quality of computed radiography systems for mammography
    Yang, Chang-Ying Joseph
    Huang, Weidong
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6913
  • [10] Digital radiography exposure indices: A review
    Mothiram, Ursula
    Brennan, Patrick C.
    Lewis, Sarah J.
    Moran, Bernadette
    Robinson, John
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2014, 61 (02): : 112 - 118