Citizen participation in decision-making: can one make a difference?

被引:19
作者
Fitzgerald, Ciara [1 ]
McCarthy, Stephen [1 ]
Carton, Fergal [1 ]
Connor, Yvonne O. [1 ]
Lynch, Laura [1 ]
Adam, Frederic [1 ]
机构
[1] Cork Univ, Sch Business, Univ Coll, Business Informat Syst, Cork, Ireland
关键词
Word; citizen participation; responsible research and innovation; visions; technology assessment;
D O I
10.1080/12460125.2016.1187395
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Big Data promises benefits for society as well as business. Do policy makers know how best to use this scale of data driven decision-making in an effective way for citizens? Citizen participation is portrayed in literature as a key component in policy decision-making. Yet, this decision-making process to date is often driven by other stakeholders such as scientific experts, academic institutions, national and international governing bodies, to name but a few. Furthermore, there is scant literature on the best way to create policy for new technology, taking into consideration the voice of the citizen. The prevailing question, therefore, is what extent does citizen participation in decision-making make a difference to shaping policy for technology? Our paper explores an experimental method for citizens to make a difference to European policy decision-making on the future of technology and the impact on society. Employing a case study of Irish citizens as part of the CIMULACT (Citizen and Multi-Actor Consultation on Horizon 2020) project this paper reports a new methodology for gathering citizens' perspectives on future decision-making policies on technology. The findings reveal key advantages and disadvantages to this methodology. This paper makes a number of contributions to both the academic and practitioner communities.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 260
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fairness in moose management decision-making: the citizens' perspective
    Lauber, TB
    Knuth, BA
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1997, 25 (04): : 776 - 787
  • [42] PREFERENCES FOR POLITICAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES AND ISSUE PUBLICS
    Wojcieszak, Magdalena
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2014, 78 (04) : 917 - 939
  • [43] Institutionalizing Telemedicine Applications: The Challenge of Legitimizing Decision-Making
    Zanaboni, Paolo
    Lettieri, Emanuele
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (03) : e72
  • [44] Healthcare decision-making applications using multicriteria decision analysis: A scoping review
    Glaize, Annabelle
    Duenas, Alejandra
    Di Martinelly, Christine
    Fagnot, Isabelle
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2019, 26 (1-2) : 62 - 83
  • [45] Policy Target Populations and Public Participation in Agency Decision Making
    Neshkova, Milena I.
    Guo, Hai
    INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 21 (02) : 297 - 325
  • [46] Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making
    Smith, PD
    McDonough, MH
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2001, 14 (03) : 239 - 249
  • [47] Making Citizen Participation Work: The Challenging Search for New Forms of Local Democracy in The Netherlands
    Geurtz, Casper
    Van de wijdeven, Ted
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2010, 36 (04) : 531 - 549
  • [48] Development of a Transparent Interactive Decision Interrogator to Facilitate the Decision-Making Process in Health Care
    Bujkiewicz, Sylwia
    Jones, Hayley E.
    Lai, Monica C. W.
    Cooper, Nicola J.
    Hawkins, Neil
    Squires, Hazel
    Abrams, Keith R.
    Spiegelhalter, David J.
    Sutton, Alex J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (05) : 768 - 776
  • [49] Analysing coverage decision-making: opening Pandora's box?
    Fischer, Katharina Elisabeth
    Leidl, Reiner
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2014, 15 (09) : 899 - 906
  • [50] Procedural fairness in algorithmic decision-making: the role of public engagement
    Decker, Marie Christin
    Wegner, Laila
    Leicht-Scholten, Carmen
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 27 (01)