A COMPARISON OF ADVECTION ALGORITHMS COUPLED WITH CHEMISTRY

被引:17
作者
CHOCK, DP
WINKLER, SL
机构
[1] Ford Research Laboratory, Ford Motor Company, PO Box 2053, Dearborn, MI 48121, United States
关键词
AIR QUALITY MODELING; ADVECTION ALGORITHMS; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; NUMERICAL METHODS;
D O I
10.1016/1352-2310(94)90439-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three-dimensional air quality models face the problem of solving the advection or advection-dominated transport equation. The performance of six advection algorithms coupled with chemistry is assessed here. The six algorithms are the forward-EuIer Taylor-Galerkin (FETG) method, the implicit Chapeau-function method, a streamline upwind Petrov-Galerkin (SUPG) method, Smolarkiewicz's method, a semi-Lagrangian (SemiLag6) method, and the accurate space-derivative (ASD) method coupled with periodicity recovery. These methods are coupled with a 10-step chemistry involving 10 species simulating the essence of atmospheric photochemical reactions. The flow held is a two-dimensional, nondivergent rotating velocity field. The domain has 33 x 33 grid cells. Two test cases defined by the initial conditions are considered: (1) non-zero background concentrations for all species except four that have an additional conic profile; (2) same as (1) for a region that covers 11 x 11 grid cells with the conic profile at its center, while the concentrations of all species outside the 11 x 11 concentration platform are set equal to zero, After one full rotation in 24 h, for test case (1), the ASD gives the most accurate results, followed by FETG and the chapeau-function method. The Smolarkiewicz method gives the least-accurate result. For test case (2), no method performs well for NO and OH. For most species, ASD and FETG still yield accurate results. To assure highly accurate advection results for all concentration profiles, however, one may have to resort to a particle-trajectory method such as the particle-grid modelling approach.
引用
收藏
页码:2659 / 2675
页数:17
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   STREAMLINE UPWIND PETROV-GALERKIN FORMULATIONS FOR CONVECTION DOMINATED FLOWS WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON THE INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS [J].
BROOKS, AN ;
HUGHES, TJR .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1982, 32 (1-3) :199-259
[2]   A PARTICLE GRID AIR-QUALITY MODELING APPROACH .1. THE DISPERSION ASPECT [J].
CHOCK, DP ;
WINKLER, SL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1994, 99 (D1) :1019-1031
[3]   A PARTICLE GRID AIR-QUALITY MODELING APPROACH .2. COUPLING WITH CHEMISTRY [J].
CHOCK, DP ;
WINKLER, SL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1994, 99 (D1) :1033-1041
[4]   A COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING THE ADVECTION EQUATION-III [J].
CHOCK, DP .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1991, 25 (5-6) :853-871
[5]   A COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING THE ADVECTION EQUATION [J].
CHOCK, DP ;
DUNKER, AM .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1983, 17 (01) :11-24
[6]   A COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING THE ADVECTION EQUATION .2. [J].
CHOCK, DP .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1985, 19 (04) :571-586
[9]   QUASI-STEADY-STATE APPROXIMATIONS IN AIR-POLLUTION MODELING - COMPARISON OF TWO NUMERICAL SCHEMES FOR OXIDANT PREDICTION [J].
HESSTVEDT, E ;
HOV, O ;
ISAKSEN, ISA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL KINETICS, 1978, 10 (09) :971-994
[10]   COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL TECHNIQUES FOR USE IN AIR-POLLUTION MODELS WITH NON-LINEAR CHEMICAL-REACTIONS [J].
HOV, O ;
ZLATEV, Z ;
BERKOWICZ, R ;
ELIASSEN, A ;
PRAHM, LP .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1989, 23 (05) :967-983