Gender and language learning strategies: looking beyond the categories

被引:17
作者
Liyanage, Indika [1 ]
Bartlett, Brendan John [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Educ & Profess Studiesc, Griffith, Qld, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09571736.2011.574818
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research on language learning strategies (LLS) has pointed to a significant association at a general level between learners' gender and their choice of LLS. To explore this generality further, we conducted a study on gender and strategy use with Sri Lankan learners (N - 886) of English as a second language (ESL) in five different learning contexts: speaking in class, listening in class, listening and speaking outside class, reading in class and writing in class. We found that when preferences for individual strategies were considered rather than for strategies in some broadly categorised group such as cognitive, metacognitive or affective strategies, some preferences did not associate with gender; nevertheless, some strategies were clearly preferred by males while others were clearly preferred by females. Perhaps most importantly for teacher development, we found that there were distinct preferences for males and females depending on the learning contexts in which specific strategies were reportedly being utilised.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 253
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Abeykoon A T, 1995, Asia Pac Popul J, V10, P5
[2]  
Anderson J. R., 1981, COGNITIVE SKILLS THE
[4]   SEX-DIFFERENCES IN SELF-REPORTED BELIEFS ABOUT FOREIGN-LANGUAGE LEARNING AND AUTHENTIC ORAL AND WRITTEN INPUT [J].
BACON, SMC ;
FINNEMANN, MD .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 1992, 42 (04) :471-495
[5]   SEX-DIFFERENCES IN LISTENING VOCABULARY [J].
BOYLE, JP .
LANGUAGE LEARNING, 1987, 37 (02) :273-284
[6]  
Breen M. P., 1987, LANGUAGE LEARNING TA, P23, DOI DOI 10.1075/TBLT.1.18LEA
[7]  
CANAGARAJAH S, 1999, RESISTING LINGUISTIC
[8]  
Chambers J., 2003, SOCIALLINGUISTIC THE
[9]  
Chamot A.U., 2004, ELECT J FOREIGN LANG, V1, P14, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0261444808005612
[10]  
Chamot A. U., 1993, STRATEGIC INTERACTIO, P36