Responses to Deception in the Workplace: Perceptions of Credibility, Power, and Trustworthiness

被引:18
作者
Dunleavy, Katie Neary [1 ]
Chory, Rebecca M. [2 ]
Goodboy, Alan K. [3 ]
机构
[1] La Salle Univ, Commun Dept, 1900 West Olney Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, Dept Commun Studies, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[3] Bloomsburg Univ, Dept Commun Studies, Bloomsburg, PA USA
关键词
Credibility; Deception; Leader Member Exchange; Power; Trust;
D O I
10.1080/10510971003603879
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study examined full-time employees' perceptions of a coworker's credibility, power, and trustworthiness after the coworker engaged in organizational deception or truthtelling. Participants read one of three scenarios, each of which differed in the type of message (honest, withholding deceptive, distortion deceptive) the coworker communicated. Participants then evaluated the coworker's credibility, power, and trustworthiness. Results indicated that organizational members perceived the coworker as more competent, of high character, more powerful, and more trustworthy when the coworker told the truth versus deceived. Organizational members also considered the coworker to be higher in competence, character, expert power, and referent power when the coworker deceived through withholding versus distorting information. It appears that although honesty may be the best policy in the organization, all forms of deception are not equally destructive.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 255
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Perceptions of Trustworthiness Online: The Role of Visual and Textual Information [J].
Toma, Catalina L. .
2010 ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK, 2010, :13-21
[32]   Mock Juror Perceptions of Intoxicated Eyewitness Credibility [J].
Crossland, Deborah ;
Kneller, Wendy ;
Wilcock, Rachel .
JOURNAL OF POLICE AND CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 38 (01) :105-116
[33]   Credibility aspects' perceptions of social networks, a survey [J].
Idrees, Amira M. ;
Helmy, Yehia ;
Khedr, Ayman E. .
SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING, 2022, 12 (01)
[34]   American and Korean Perceptions of Sex Differences in Deception [J].
Steiner, Eric T. ;
Cha, Young-Jae ;
Baek, Sojung .
EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 18 (02)
[35]   Mock Juror Perceptions of Intoxicated Eyewitness Credibility [J].
Deborah Crossland ;
Wendy Kneller ;
Rachel Wilcock .
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2023, 38 :105-116
[36]   Credibility aspects’ perceptions of social networks, a survey [J].
Amira M. Idrees ;
Yehia Helmy ;
Ayman E. Khedr .
Social Network Analysis and Mining, 2022, 12
[37]   An Agenda for Studying Credibility Perceptions of Visual Misinformation [J].
Peng, Yilang ;
Lu, Yingdan ;
Shen, Cuihua .
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2023, 40 (02) :225-237
[38]   Hot topics in science communication: Aggressive language decreases trustworthiness and credibility in scientific debates [J].
Koenig, Lars ;
Jucks, Regina .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2019, 28 (04) :401-416
[39]   Enhancing the trustworthiness and credibility of human resource development: Evidence-based management to the rescue? [J].
Gubbins, Claire ;
Harney, Brian ;
van der Werff, Lisa ;
Rousseau, Denise M. .
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2018, 29 (03) :193-202
[40]   Attacking science on social media: How user comments affect perceived trustworthiness and credibility [J].
Gierth, Lukas ;
Bromme, Rainer .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2020, 29 (02) :230-247