A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression

被引:102
作者
Berry, Scott M. [1 ]
Broglio, Kristine [1 ]
Bunker, Mark [2 ]
Jayewardene, Amara [2 ]
Olin, Bryan [2 ]
Rush, A. John [3 ]
机构
[1] Berry Consultants, Austin, TX 78746 USA
[2] Cyberon Inc, Houston, TX 77058 USA
[3] Duke NUS, Off Clin Sci, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Bayesian meta-analysis; remission rate; response rate; treatment-resistant depression; vagus nerve stimulation; VNS Therapy;
D O I
10.2147/MDER.S41017
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare response and remission rates in depressed patients with chronic treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Therapy (R) plus treatment as usual (VNS + TAU) or TAU alone in a meta-analysis using Bayesian hierarchical models. Data sources and study selection: Six outpatient, multicenter, clinical trials that have evaluated VNS + TAU or TAU in TRD, including two single-arm studies of VNS + TAU (n = 60 and n = 74), a randomized study of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 235), a randomized study of VNS + TAU comparing different VNS stimulation intensities (n = 331), a nonrandomized registry of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 636), and a single-arm study of TAU (n = 124) to provide longer-term, control data for comparison with VNS-treated patients. Data extraction: A systematic review of individual patient-level data based on the intent-to-treat principle, including all patients who contributed more than one post-baseline visit. Response was based on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions scale's Improvement subscale (CGI-I), as these were the two clinician-rated measures common across all or most studies. Remission was based on the MADRS. Results: Outcomes were compared from baseline up to 96 weeks of treatment with VNS + TAU (n = 1035) versus TAU (n = 425). The MADRS response rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 12%, 18%, 28%, and 32% versus 4%, 7%, 12%, and 14% for TAU. The MADRS remission rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 3%, 5%, 10%, and 14% versus 1%, 1%, 2%, and 4%, for TAU. Adjunctive VNS Therapy was associated with a greater likelihood of response (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12, 4.66) and remission (OR = 4.99, CI: 2.93, 7.76), compared with TAU. For patients who had responded to VNS + TAU at 24 weeks, sustained response was more likely at 48 weeks (OR = 1.98, CI: 1.34, 3.01) and at 96 weeks (OR = 3.42, CI: 1.78, 7.31). Similar results were observed for CGI-I response. Conclusion: For patients with chronic TRD, VNS + TAU has greater response and remission rates that are more likely to persist than TAU.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 35
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]   Estimating the potential savings with vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a payer perspective [J].
Cohen, Lawrence J. ;
Allen, John C., Jr. .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2008, 24 (08) :2203-2217
[12]   Safety and efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in treatment-resistant depression. A systematic review [J].
Daban, Claire ;
Martinez-Aran, Anabel ;
Cruz, Nuria ;
Vieta, Eduard .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2008, 110 (1-2) :1-15
[13]   Efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in bipolar versus unipolar major depression: a meta-analysis [J].
Dierckx, Bram ;
Heijnen, Willemijn T. ;
van den Broek, Walter W. ;
Birkenhaeger, Tom K. .
BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2012, 14 (02) :146-150
[14]   Prospective, long-term, multicenter study of the naturalistic outcomes of patients with treatment-resistant depression [J].
Dunner, David L. ;
Rush, A. John ;
Russell, James M. ;
Burke, Michael ;
Woodard, Stacy ;
Wingard, Peggy ;
Allen, John .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 67 (05) :688-695
[15]  
Feldman Rachel L, 2013, J Med Econ, V16, P62, DOI 10.3111/13696998.2012.724745
[16]   A one-year comparison of vagus nerve stimulation with treatment as usual for treatment-resistant depression [J].
George, MS ;
Rush, AJ ;
Marangell, LB ;
Sackeim, HA ;
Brannan, SK ;
Davis, SM ;
Howland, R ;
Kling, MA ;
Moreno, F ;
Rittberg, B ;
Dunner, D ;
Schwartz, T ;
Carpenter, L ;
Burke, M ;
Ninan, P ;
Goodnick, P .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 58 (05) :364-373
[17]   The economic burden of depression in the US: societal and patient perspectives [J].
Greenberg, PE ;
Birnbaum, HG .
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2005, 6 (03) :369-376
[18]  
Guy W., 1976, ECDCEU ASSESSMENT MA
[19]   Antidepressant Pharmacotherapy Failure and Response to Subsequent Electroconvulsive Therapy A Meta-Analysis [J].
Heijnen, Willemijn T. ;
Birkenhager, Tom K. ;
Wierdsma, Andre I. ;
van den Broek, Walter W. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 30 (05) :616-619
[20]   Clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs associated with implantation of vagus nerve stimulation therapy in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy [J].
Helmers, Sandra L. ;
Duh, Mei Sheng ;
Guerin, Annie ;
Sarda, Sujata P. ;
Samuelson, Thomas M. ;
Bunker, Mark T. ;
Olin, Bryan D. ;
Jackson, Stanley D. ;
Faught, Edward .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2012, 16 (05) :449-458