A patient-level meta-analysis of studies evaluating vagus nerve stimulation therapy for treatment-resistant depression

被引:102
作者
Berry, Scott M. [1 ]
Broglio, Kristine [1 ]
Bunker, Mark [2 ]
Jayewardene, Amara [2 ]
Olin, Bryan [2 ]
Rush, A. John [3 ]
机构
[1] Berry Consultants, Austin, TX 78746 USA
[2] Cyberon Inc, Houston, TX 77058 USA
[3] Duke NUS, Off Clin Sci, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Bayesian meta-analysis; remission rate; response rate; treatment-resistant depression; vagus nerve stimulation; VNS Therapy;
D O I
10.2147/MDER.S41017
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare response and remission rates in depressed patients with chronic treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Therapy (R) plus treatment as usual (VNS + TAU) or TAU alone in a meta-analysis using Bayesian hierarchical models. Data sources and study selection: Six outpatient, multicenter, clinical trials that have evaluated VNS + TAU or TAU in TRD, including two single-arm studies of VNS + TAU (n = 60 and n = 74), a randomized study of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 235), a randomized study of VNS + TAU comparing different VNS stimulation intensities (n = 331), a nonrandomized registry of VNS + TAU versus TAU (n = 636), and a single-arm study of TAU (n = 124) to provide longer-term, control data for comparison with VNS-treated patients. Data extraction: A systematic review of individual patient-level data based on the intent-to-treat principle, including all patients who contributed more than one post-baseline visit. Response was based on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions scale's Improvement subscale (CGI-I), as these were the two clinician-rated measures common across all or most studies. Remission was based on the MADRS. Results: Outcomes were compared from baseline up to 96 weeks of treatment with VNS + TAU (n = 1035) versus TAU (n = 425). The MADRS response rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 12%, 18%, 28%, and 32% versus 4%, 7%, 12%, and 14% for TAU. The MADRS remission rate for VNS + TAU at 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 3%, 5%, 10%, and 14% versus 1%, 1%, 2%, and 4%, for TAU. Adjunctive VNS Therapy was associated with a greater likelihood of response (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.12, 4.66) and remission (OR = 4.99, CI: 2.93, 7.76), compared with TAU. For patients who had responded to VNS + TAU at 24 weeks, sustained response was more likely at 48 weeks (OR = 1.98, CI: 1.34, 3.01) and at 96 weeks (OR = 3.42, CI: 1.78, 7.31). Similar results were observed for CGI-I response. Conclusion: For patients with chronic TRD, VNS + TAU has greater response and remission rates that are more likely to persist than TAU.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 35
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Aaronson ST, BRAIN STIMUL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NEUR DEV PAN M FDA G
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, CST95 COD SYMB THES
[4]   Two-Year Outcome of Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Depression [J].
Bajbouj, Malek ;
Merkl, Angela ;
Schlaepfer, Thomas E. ;
Frick, Caroline ;
Zobel, Astrid ;
Maier, Wolfgang ;
O'Keane, Veronica ;
Corcoran, Ciaran ;
Adolfsson, Rolf ;
Trimble, Michael ;
Rau, Harald ;
Hoff, Hans-Joachim ;
Padberg, Frank ;
Mueller-Siecheneder, Florian ;
Audenaert, Kurt ;
van den Abbeele, Dirk ;
Matthews, Keith ;
Christmas, David ;
Eljamel, Sam ;
Heuser, Isabella .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 30 (03) :273-281
[5]   Analysis of direct hospital costs before and 18 months after treatment with vagus nerve stimulation therapy in 43 patients [J].
Ben-Menachem, E ;
Hellström, K ;
Verstappen, D .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (06) :S44-S47
[6]   Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for pharmacoresistant epilepsy: Effect on health care utilization [J].
Bernstein, Allan L. ;
Barkan, Howard ;
Hess, Terry .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2007, 10 (01) :134-137
[7]  
Berry SM, 2010, CH CRC BIOSTAT SER, P1, DOI 10.1201/EBK1439825488
[8]   Direct medical costs of refractory epilepsy incurred by three different treatment modalities:: A prospective assessment [J].
Boon, P ;
D'Havé, M ;
Van Walleghem, P ;
Michielsen, G ;
Vonck, K ;
Caemaert, J ;
De Reuck, J .
EPILEPSIA, 2002, 43 (01) :96-102
[9]   Concomitant use of vagus nerve stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression [J].
Burke, Michael J. ;
Husain, Mustafa M. .
JOURNAL OF ECT, 2006, 22 (03) :218-222
[10]  
Carney S, 2003, LANCET, V361, P799