Unequal chances: Race, class and schooling

被引：13
作者：
Satz, Debra [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Stanford Univ, Eth Soc, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Philosophy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Polit Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源：
THEORY AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATION | 2012年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词：
adequacy; equal citizenship; fair equality of educational opportunity; stunted ambition;
D O I：
10.1177/1477878512446541
中图分类号：
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号：
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要：
This article compares a demanding conception of educational adequacy with the Rawlsian idea of fair equality of opportunity. It defends fair equality of opportunity against criticisms, but argues that it needs to be explicitly anchored in a theory of equal citizenship.
引用
收藏
页码：155 / 170
页数：16
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Fair opportunity in education: A democratic equality perspective [J].
Anderson, Elizabeth .
ETHICS, 2007, 117 (04) :595-622
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, POLITICAL LIBERALISM
[3]   Against Rawlsian equality of opportunity [J].
Arneson, RJ .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 1999, 93 (01) :77-112
[4]  
Aud S., 2011, CONDITION ED
[5]   Equality, priority, and positional goods [J].
Brighouse, Harry ;
Swift, Adam .
ETHICS, 2006, 116 (03) :471-497
[6]  
Brighouse H, 2007, RES PUBLICA-NETH, V13, P147, DOI 10.1007/s11158-007-9029-8
[7]  
Fishkin James S., 1984, JUSTICE EQUAL OPPORT
[8]   Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school [J].
Fryer, RG ;
Levitt, SD .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2004, 86 (02) :447-464
[9]  
Fullinwider R, 2004, LEVELING PLAYING FIE
[10]   Choosing equal educational opportunity: School reform, law, and public policy [J].
Heise, M .
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2001, 68 (03) :1113-1136
123