Flipped classroom with cooperative learning as a cornerstone

被引:74
作者
Munir, M. T. [1 ]
Baroutian, Saeid [1 ]
Young, Brent R. [1 ]
Carter, Susan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Fac Engn, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Ctr Learning & Res Higher Educ CLeaR, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Flipped classroom; pedagogical model; cooperative learning;
D O I
10.1016/j.ece.2018.05.001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article discusses the reasons for flipping a classroom in an Engineering course and for including cooperative learning, supported by the literature. The case study then notes the challenges in changing the teaching mode, for example, in building front-loaded resources, and in coaxing students into using them. Bloom's taxonomy enables constructive alignment, adding a significant third pedagogic adjustment. Evidence from students shows what worked and what didn't. Findings were likely to alert other lecturers attempting greater student engagement to what is entailed and to the commonality of time-expense when improving learning outcomes. Then student feedback on the learning experience was analysed to show their perspective on the changes, and to be used to fine-tune the course for a second cycle of action research. The results showed that flipped classroom helped to develop and improve students' learning and critical analysis skills. Furthermore, cooperative learning improved students' communication skills and enabled them to build their teamwork and problem-solving skills. More than 90% of students agreed that flipped classroom with cooperative learning enabled them to extend their skills. Nonetheless, we show how much work is required to achieve this, and what pitfalls lie in the way. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings [J].
Johnson, David W. ;
Johnson, Roger T. ;
Smith, Karl .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2007, 19 (01) :15-29
[22]   Energizing Learning: The Instructional Power of Conflict [J].
Johnson, David W. ;
Johnson, Roger T. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2009, 38 (01) :37-51
[23]  
Jones K. O., 2009, 39 IEEE FRONT ED C, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/FIE.2009.5350598
[24]   A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education [J].
Karabulut-Ilgu, Aliye ;
Cherrez, Nadia Jaramillo ;
Jahren, Charles T. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 49 (03) :398-411
[25]   Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education [J].
Kolb, AY ;
Kolb, DA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2005, 4 (02) :193-212
[26]  
Lo Chung Kwan, 2017, Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn, V12, P4, DOI 10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
[27]  
Lombardi M. M., 2007, EDUCAUSE LEARNING IN, V1, P1
[28]   Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis [J].
Lou, YP ;
Abrami, PC ;
d'Apollonia, S .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 71 (03) :449-521
[29]   Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course [J].
Love, Betty ;
Hodge, Angie ;
Grandgenett, Neal ;
Swift, Andrew W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 45 (03) :317-324
[30]   QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING .1. OUTCOME AND PROCESS [J].
MARTON, F ;
SALJO, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 46 (FEB) :4-11