ARTIFACTUAL ENDOCERVICAL ATYPIA INDUCED BY ENDOCERVICAL BRUSH COLLECTION

被引：16

作者：

FIORELLA, RM

CASAFRANCISCO, D

YOKOTA, S

KRAGEL, PJ

机构：

[1] Department of Pathology, Truman Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri

[2] University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky

来源：

DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY | 1994年 / 11卷 / 01期

关键词：

ENDOCERVICAL ATYPIA; CYTOBRUSH; PAP SMEAR;

D O I：

10.1002/dc.2840110118

中图分类号：

R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];

学科分类号：

1001 ;

摘要：

The cytologic distinctions between artifactual atypia induced by endocervical brush collection, endocervical glandular repair, and endocervical glandular dysplasia or neoplasia are often difficult. This difficulty is amplified by the lack of accepted cytologic criteria for endocervical glandular dysplasia, and the fact that earlier studies defining the significant cytologic features of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ and endocervical adenocarcinoma (endocervical neoplasia) utilized a swab for endocervical cell retrieval. With the almost universal adoption of the endocervical brush, it is important to redefine those cytologic characteristics that differentiate true endocervical glandular dysplasia or neoplasia from reactive or reparative processes and instrument artifact. From our data, it appears that the classically described cytologic discriminators between a negative smear and smears of endocervical dysplasia or neoplasia are basically unchanged with some minor modifications for endocervical brush-collected samples. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

引用

页码：79 / 84

页数：6

共 32 条

[1]

Ayer B, Pacey F, Greenberg M., Cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions, Acta Cytol, 32, pp. 318-324, (1988)

[2]

Betsill W, Clark A., Early endocervical glandular neoplasia, histomorphology, and cytomorphology, Acta Cytol, 30, pp. 115-126, (1986)

[3]

Boon M, Baak JPA, Kurver PJH, Overdiep SH, Verdonk GW, Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix, Cancer, 48, pp. 768-773, (1981)

[4]

Boon M, Zeppa P, Noordam EO, Kok LP, Exploiting the “toothpick effect” of the cytobrush by plastic embedding of cervical samples, Acta Cytol, 35, pp. 57-63, (1991)

[5]

Bousfield L, Pacey F, Young Q, Krumins I, Osborn R., Expanded criteria for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix and related lesions, Acta Cytol, 24, pp. 283-295, (1980)

[6]

Buscema J, Woodruff JD, Significance of neoplastic atypicalities in endocervical epithelium, Gynecol Oncol, 17, pp. 356-362, (1984)

[7]

Brown LJR, Wells M., Cervical glandular atypia associated with squamous intraepithelial neoplasia: a premalignant lesion?, J Clin Pathol, 39, pp. 22-28, (1986)

[8]

Clark AH, Betsill WL, Early endocervical glandular neoplasia, morphometric analysis of the cells, Acta Cytol, 30, pp. 127-134, (1986)

[9]

Gloor E, Hurlimann J., Cervical intraepithelial glandular neoplasia (adenocarcinoma in situ and glandular dysplasia), Cancer, 58, pp. 1272-1280, (1986)

[10]

Goff BA, Atanasoff P, Brown E, Muntz HG, Bell DA, Rice LW, Endocervical glandular atypia in Papanicolaou smears, Obstet Gynecol, 79, pp. 101-104, (1992)

← 1 2 3 4 →