The impact of market orientation and corporate social responsibility on firm performance Evidence from China

被引:46
作者
Qu, Riliang [1 ]
机构
[1] Aston Business Sch, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Market orientation; Corporate social responsibility; China; Business performance;
D O I
10.1108/13555850910997607
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the joint effects of market orientation ( MO) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm performance. Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected via a questionnaire survey of star-rated hotels in China and a total of 143 valid responses were received. The hypotheses were tested by employing structural equation modelling with a maximum likelihood estimation option. Findings - It was found that although both MO and CSR could enhance performance, once the effects of CSR are accounted for, the direct effects of MO on performance diminish considerably to almost non-existent. Although this result may be due to the fact that the research is conducted in China, a country where CSR might be crucially important to performance given the country's socialist legacy, it nonetheless provides strong evidence that MO's impact on organizational performance is mediated by CSR. Research limitations/implications - The main limitations include the use of cross-sectional data, the subjective measurement of performance and the uniqueness of the research setting (China). The findings provide an additional important insight into the processes by which a market oriented culture is transformed into superior organizational performance. Originality/value - This paper is one of the first to examine the joint effects of MO and CSR on business performance. The empirical evidence from China adds to the existing literature on the respective importance of MO and CSR.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 582
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Agarwal S., 2003, J SERV MARK, V17, P68, DOI DOI 10.1108/08876040310461282
[2]   Customer satisfaction and shareholder value [J].
Anderson, EW ;
Fornell, C ;
Mazvancheryl, SK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2004, 68 (04) :172-185
[4]   SOME METHODS FOR RESPECIFYING MEASUREMENT MODELS TO OBTAIN UNIDIMENSIONAL CONSTRUCT MEASUREMENT [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1982, 19 (04) :453-460
[5]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[6]   AN EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY AND PROFITABILITY [J].
AUPPERLE, KE ;
CARROLL, AB ;
HATFIELD, JD .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1985, 28 (02) :446-463
[7]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1988, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V16, P74, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1007/BF02723327]
[8]   REPRESENTING AND TESTING ORGANIZATIONAL THEORIES - A HOLISTIC CONSTRUAL [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1982, 27 (03) :459-489
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]   Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers' relationships with companies [J].
Bhattacharya, CB ;
Sen, S .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2003, 67 (02) :76-88